i have a copy of a foxfire book, and the printing is from 1971. FYI.
I think a merger of these 3 articles (Foxfire books, Foxfire Fund, and Foxfire (magazine)) makes sense for many reasons:
- Each article covers a different aspect of the Foxfire movement.
- Each article is short.
- Each article repeats much of the same information as the other articles.
For these reasons I think 1 comprehensive article covering the entire Foxfire movement would be better than 3 separate ones. McBrayn (talk) 03:47, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
- Yup. Merge 'em all under the magazine, which came first and allowed the other two to exist. --Orange Mike | Talk 18:22, 15 July 2010 (UTC)