Talk:Fred St-Gelais

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as Low-importance).
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Canada: Quebec / Montreal / Music Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Quebec.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Montreal (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian music.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Professional sound production Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Professional sound production, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sound recording and reproduction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Professional sound productionWikipedia:WikiProject Professional sound productionTemplate:WikiProject Professional sound productionProfessional sound production articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

R&B and Soul Music

	R&B and Soul Music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of R&B and Soul Music articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.R&B and Soul MusicWikipedia:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicTemplate:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicR&B and Soul Music articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Pop music

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

No violation of copyright[edit]

No violation of Copyright is occuring in the Biography section of this article, because the author (myself, Fred St-Gelais) also wrote the article here: http://web.mac.com/fredstgelais/iWeb/Fred%20St-Gelais/Bio.html (added at 18:54, 22 August 2009 by Wannabex) Hananekosan (talk) 19:22, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion about blanked page[edit]

@Wannabex: I hope you haven't blanked the page because you intend to delete it. Though it's an autobiography, I think it has a good change of passing the neutral point of view checks. It needs some work to be wikified, but all new articles do. Hananekosan (talk) 19:22, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

@Wannabex: Please don't use blanking the page as a means to delete tags other wikipedians have attached to your article. It's no big deal this time, and your new text required new tags anyhow, but people will not appreciate having their tags "addressed" in this manner. :) What I technically should have done is back out your changes so that the article was once again in the state it was before you used this method to delete the tags. (Using your method to delete tags is a no-no.) Also, your article currently links to quite a few wiki articles that don't exist, and one that was deleted because it didn't meed the notoriety requirements. If you are planning to create or recreate these articles, please make sure the subjects meet the notoriety requirements. Thank you! Some ideas for categories are musicians; people born in the year you were born; people from Quebec, etc. You will probably also want to add a biography infobox at some point as well. Cheers.Hananekosan (talk) 19:36, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Further discussion about blanked page/tags[edit]

Well, I was scared to see it deleted, so I figured I'd replace it with something VERY basic (and neutral). All those messages that appeared on top were very scary, and I really had no idea what to remove or change to make it more neutral. I didn't find anything that wasn't factual or that expressed an opinion in it. Also, I'm not a programmer and had no idea how to "improve the layout", or "wikify" it, or change the links so they passed the wiki standards. People keep on asking why I don't show up on wikipedia after all thoses platinum and gold records on my walls. After much asking around, turns out all my producer friends started the wikipedia articles on themselves, so I thought it was the way to go. I guess I'll just leave the very basic one and wait to see if someone cares to make it better (and more neutral).Wannabex (talk) 19:45, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I believe the changes I made got the article past the initial issues. For future reference, message/warning boxes contain information that points you toward correcting the issues, and further information is in the welcome information I placed on your user talk page. Hananekosan (talk) 00:19, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously, as I said, I went back and made the article really basic and free from ANY opinion, and now it has even more issues! What should I do? This is really complicated and confusing! Can I just undo the whole thing? Meaning delete it altogether and wait for someone (perhaps a wikipedia pro) to start an article in the future?Wannabex (talk) 19:51, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

@Wannabex. Hi again, no worries. None of the tags in the article are personal, they're just a method the wikipedia community uses to keep track of things to do, to notify article authors of things, and so forth, all with the end goal of keeping wikipedia up to a certain level of quality and, above all, consistency. It takes some time to become familiar with the way things work around here and I admire you for jumping right in and creating an article. There are a group of wikipedians who partol the new articles to for issues, not to be punitive (though I know it must feel that way), but to make everyone aware of issues as soon as possible since it's usually easier to fix issues when the article is still in the beginning stange, rather than when some fundamental problem has been built upon for many interations. Based on what I saw of the article in progress, you do meet the notoriety requirements. It's a little unusual for someone to start an article about himself but it's not forbidden. We just have to be extra careful to maintain a neutral point of view, which should be easy to do if we stick to the facts about you and your published works/awards. I can help you with this and with developing the article in general. The reason it was tagged as a potential conflict of interest is because you are the author and the subject. It's standard practice to mark these things, and nothing personal. This page is supposed to be where we discuss the article, so I'd like to transition the rest of the conversation about wikipedia in general to your user talk page, if you don't mind. And we can continue to talk about the article development here.Hananekosan (talk) 21:19, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

IP edits[edit]

@96.20.114.206: Fred/Wannabex, is this you making edits via IP address instead of user name? That's permitted, I'm just trying to sort out who I'm speaking with. :) If this is another editor, you might want to refer to the discussion on Wannabex's talk page. Thanks for categorizing the article! Hananekosan (talk) 21:36, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Under construction[edit]

I added the under construction tag to make it unlikely the page will be deleted while we're working on bringing it up to standards/"wiki"fying it. Hananekosan (talk) 22:08, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

BLP[edit]

We should familiarize ourselves with the guidelines for biographies of living persons: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons as they directly pertain to an article such as this. Hananekosan (talk) 22:08, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's coming along but still needs improvement[edit]

We need to flesh out the rest of the information box if we can get information from neutral, reliable sources. For instance, Fred, I'm sure you could point us to an article that says your year of birth on it so that we know if you were born in 1976 and just turned 33 or were born in 1975 and will be turning 24 soon. That's if you don't just want to give us your DOB or publish it on your website. For the information box, you can also tell us there you were born, or point us to a verifiable site that contains that information. If you have a nickname and you want it included in the infobox, it can be. Please list the labels you are affiliated with.

I've found quite a few sources we can cite, but need you to keep help looking as well. I'll add what I can tomorrow but feel free to add yours at any time. You might want to read through a tutorial and some existing good articles to see how references work. You really need to markup the pertinent inline text and give the proper format for the link, and the References list will build at the end of the article. I can walk you through it if need be. I hope this makes sense. I think this will shape up to be a very good article when all is said and done. Hananekosan (talk) 09:30, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Considering presenting tracks/albums/TVs in a tabular format[edit]

Sort of like the discography you've probably seen elsewhere. Thoughts on that? Hananekosan (talk) 09:30, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm overwhelmed! I would need tons of time to learn how to do all this! I don't know the first thing about how to do all that! I've got a lot of older articles, pictures and other stuff to prove everything I wrote is true and from a neutral point of view, but It's not necessarily on the web! Even if I find it, I don't know how to make the info point to the source. I'm in the process of updating my all music guide info, but it take weeks for the updates to sho (they have to go through the actual CD booklets). I want the article to be legit! Thanks again for your help. I will do my best to make it better with the time I have. I had purposedly deleted stuff from my biography (stuff hard to find reliable sources from) but you put it back!Wannabex (talk) 15:28, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. I'm happy to do what I can to keep what will one day be a great article from getting deleted. I said in the comments that I had restored some of the content that you had previously deleted. I did think because I felt that it was good stuff to help make the case that you are a notable enough person to have a wikipedia page. If you want to delete anything, go ahead, that's your right as a wikipedian. If you want to discuss the things you would like delete first, that's fine too. Unfortunately, we do need citations that are available on the web (but those can be scans of things you have in hard copy, provided those scans don't violate and copyright laws and are hosted somewhere public on the internet. For this conversation, consider "public" any website where you don't need a password to view content.) As I mentioned before, I found a few more references last night, so will do what I can with those today. BTW, editing in Wikipedia is easier than you think and there are templates for just about anything you can imagine, so you can always copy a format from another page and plug in your values instead of what was said on the other page. Once the All Music Guide is complete, we can use that too. These articles are seldom written once and never touched again, it's an iterative process, so it's perfectly reasonable for you and other wikipedians to continuously edit it. Hananekosan (talk) 17:19, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As I posted on the my talk page, I found tons of links to use as source, but I'm not sure how to do it. Should I just send them to you? I have no idea how to include them within the article...Wannabex (talk) 18:40, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You can post the links to the sources you found here on this talk page or on your talk page, but please use the talkback link after my signature so I know you addressed something to me. Since this article is technically an autobiography, you should be very cautious about making edits to your own page or you could run the risk of the article being in violation of neutrality, etc. As I said previously, autobiographies are not forbidden, but it's unusual for someone to work on one and maintain neutrality. That said, I'd recommend that you post the links, along with some description of what you want to say in the article that the links substantiate, for discussion. I recommend that you read Wikipedia:Autobiography for more information. Also, most people who use Wikipedia didn't know how to use it when they first signed up. If you review the materials I posted on your user talk page, you will learn a lot of things you can use when editing/writing other articles (since you should be careful about editing information about yourself) Hananekosan (talk) 00:19, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Associated acts[edit]

At some point, editors should consider the associated acts listed in the info box. I'm new to Wikipedia so probably don't have the necessary frame of reference to know how to handle this, but it seems that this field is generally used for acts in which the association is particularly strong. (See Quincy Jones, for instance.) In this article nearly every act that is listed in the article's paragraphs is listed and I don't know that the redundancy is needed in all cases. Thanks. Hananekosan (talk) 00:19, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Fred St-Gelais. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081118031314/http://www.adisq.com/doc/gala30/gala2002.html to http://www.adisq.com/doc/gala30/gala2002.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 01:43, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Fred St-Gelais. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 22:10, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fred St-Gelais. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081221191953/http://www.ctv.ca:80/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20080212/degrassi_season7_music_credits?s_name=degrassi2006&no_ads=sky to http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20080212/degrassi_season7_music_credits?s_name=degrassi2006&no_ads=sky

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:01, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Fred St-Gelais. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110603231310/http://www.quebecpop.com/MenuPrincipal2.htm to http://www.quebecpop.com/MenuPrincipal2.htm
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20080212/degrassi_season7_music_credits?s_name=degrassi2006&no_ads=sky
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101213015020/http://www.cansong.ca/en/events/2006.aspx to http://www.cansong.ca/en/events/2006.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:27, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]