From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Biography / Royalty and Nobility (Rated Start-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility.
Note icon
An appropriate infobox may need to be added to this article. Please refer to the list of biography infoboxes for further information.
WikiProject Women's History (Rated Start-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Biography assessment rating comment[edit]

WikiProject Biography Assessment

The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 03:47, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Slanted view of Fredegund?[edit]

I know that there are very few sources from this time period, but it seems like most of the information on this page is based off the work of Gregory of Tours. Having read his work, it seems like he has a blatant dislike of the woman and may therefore not be the most neutral of sources. I recall having read that she was at one point a servant, which may have been mistranslated and mean something closer to a lesser noble, however, in either case, Gregory seems to have a distaste for marriage between classes -- he comments negatively on it a few times. Also, would there be any way to get more of her background worked into this article?

Honestly, calling her a "ruthless murderer" seems a bit unfair -- plenty of other people committed similar acts of violence -- St. Clothild had her abbess dragged through the streets by her hair at one point, according to some sources, and there were certainly vindictive feuds between men. I can't help but feel that Fredegund's getting some unfair press. Sgt.widget 05:52, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Though slanted , Gregory is about the main source regarding Fredegundis. What we know is that unlike Galswinthe and Brunhildis she did not belong to an aristocratic family. Not Royal, not noble through the old Gallo-Roman senatorial nobility. Unlike her sister-in-law, her husband second wife and her brothers-in-law. Caribert's got repudiated but her manners could have cost her life and did not (because she belonged to a Touraine aristocratic family with links to the bishopric), same goes with Gunthramm's wife. True the royal playboys had fun with the servants, but a prestigious marriage was important for diplomacy . on the plus side, a low born wife could but have low born menfolk and said menfolk never unlikely to remonstarte an erring husband unlike a kingly father in law.

Fredegundis may be innocent; true none the less, she is regarded tpo this very day as a murderess by her country men and nobody has ever fought for her honour. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 15:41, 27 December 2012 (UTC)


Exactly between which years was she a regent? This should be added to the article by those who have a reference. --Aciram (talk) 16:11, 16 June 2009 (UTC)