Talk:Frederick William von Kleist

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Frederick William von Kleist/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Gog the Mild (talk · contribs) 23:17, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'll have a look at this one. Gog the Mild (talk) 23:17, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • "the order Pour le Mérite"; "the Order Pour le Mérite".  Done
  • Possibly a bracketed explanation of "Fußjägerkorps".  Done
  • Possibly a sentence on when, where and how he died?
  • "Junker" should always start with a lower case j, unless it is being used as a part of someone's name. (Which it almost never is and isn't in this article.)
In which case that article is also in conflict with the MoS. See MoS, capitals. ("Offices, titles, and positions such as president, king, emperor, grand duke, lord mayor, pope, bishop, abbot, chief financial officer, and executive director are common nouns and therefore should be in lower case when used generically: Mitterrand was the French president or There were many presidents at the meeting. They are capitalized only in the following cases: When followed by a person's name to form a title...") I have changed them all to comply with the MoS so that I can promote it to GA. Gog the Mild (talk) 17:18, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Could you check my copy edit.  Done
  • Er, that's it. Very good work. Gog the Mild (talk) 18:35, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A fine little article which required the assessor to do little. Solid, well written, well sourced, well illustrated and interesting to read. Well done. Gog the Mild (talk) 17:18, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed