Talk:Fugro/Archives/2014
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Is Western Sahara a relevant controversy?
The controversy posted about the Western Sahara has an invalid link for citation. The website posted in the citation re-directs to a new website on which a search does not appear to contain the original article. Furthermore, research on the internet reflects that Fugro quickly remedied the controversy by publicly stated that it will not participate in activities in the Western Sahara until the political conflict is resolved according to the [ http://oecdwatch.org/cases/Case_182 OECD Watch Website].
Finally, the controversy relates to a company that no longer belongs to Fugro. At a minimum, the article should reflect that Fugro Geoteam is no longer an entity of Fugro, N.V. according to Business Week.
Reading further about the controversy, it seems that Fugro was used as an example by various — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ijdcar (talk • contribs) 22:36, 21 January 2014 (UTC)