Talk:GBU-15

Military history: Technology / Weaponry / North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Merge in EGBU-15[edit]

Go for it! Happy-melon 14:02, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Chwyatt 14:59, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed. Merge the two articles. CeeWhy2 22:33, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

M-122 designation[edit]

I do not think it is correct that the designation AGM-112 was not assigned because "This was declined because the weapon was an unpowered glide bomb and GBU designation was allotted instead. The M-112 designation remains unassigned as a result.[2]"

The M-112 designation was assigned to the 12,000lb TARZON guided bomb used in the Korean War. The 12,000lb warhead was the famous Tallboy bomb used during WWII. It is probably more correct to suggest that the designation had already been assigned.

Refer: Gillespie, Weapons of Choice, Development of Precision Guided Munitions, Alabama Press, 2006, pp53-4. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maudant100 (talk • contribs) 20:22, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]