Talk:Gambian pouched rat
|WikiProject Mammals||(Rated Start-class, Mid-importance)|
I moved this commentary by 22.214.171.124 on the article page here: --Aranae 05:55, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
- Actually according to eyewitnesses who've SEEN the pouched rat species that was released in Florida, and who know the differences between species, identified them as the Emin's, or African pouched rat (C. emini), not gambian pouched rat. Both were in the pet trade, however the common person didn't know they were an entirely different species.
General lack of specific data
Despite this specie being mentioned in the article to be on of the largest muroids, there is no size data about the animal. also there is no data on lifespan and the fertility data is confusing. 126.96.36.199 (talk) 14:32, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
Confusing Fertility Period
Currently: "They have up to four litters every nine months with up to six offspring in each litter."
Why is it specifying the number of litters in nine months? Why not number of litters per year, or how frequently each litter occurs (every nine weeks? -- perhaps that "9" is getting confused?)? Or is there a 3 month infertile period per year and 9 months of fertility... ???
What is their lifespan?
- "Lifespan in captivity - average is 8 years but some have been known to live up to 10 years." // Liftarn (talk)
Removed from page
I removed the following addition to the page which may remain of interest to editors: "Here is the website to the landmind information listed on your page.. http://www.herorat.org/
I saw thei story on Frontline World"
--Aranae 15:14, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- I added it under external links. Also look at the site under "Press" for news coverage that can be used to expand the article. // Liftarn (talk)
Dubious tag on weight
I've tagged the weight in the characteristics section (10-15 pounds, which I also translated to SI units earlier) as dubious. Most other sources seem to disagree with this, although I'm struggling to find any that I'd consider authoritative. Most pet suppliers specify a maximum of about 3kg (= about 6.6 pounds), as does Britannica. If anyone has a *good* source for the weight, I'd suggest changing it to whatever that source says. JulesH (talk) 17:45, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
- The Kingdon Pocket Guide to African Mammals says body mass in Cricetomys is 1–1.4 kg. Ucucha 17:52, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
- University of Michigan Museum of Zoology - Animal Diversity Web (refered from eol) says 1 to 1.47kg for Cricetomys gambianus —Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.8.131.52 (talk) 07:47, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
- Former weight claim (10-15 pounds) was pure nonsense. Unfortunate that it has been allowed to stay up for this long since we now can expect various pages have copied it. Anyone claiming a weight significantly above the ones now provided (1-1,4 kg) should also provide a supporting citation that is high WP:RS. 184.108.40.206 (talk) 22:12, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
Removed pidgin name
I've just removed this sentence, "It is (along with other mammals) referred to by the pidgin name of "beef". ", as it is not said WHERE in Africa it is known by this name. --220.127.116.11 (talk) 21:28, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
History of the Rats
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Gambian pouched rat. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120328043327/http://www.keysnet.com:80/2012/03/24/433069/more-huge-gambian-rats-found-on.html to http://www.keysnet.com/2012/03/24/433069/more-huge-gambian-rats-found-on.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080802214756/http://www.apopo.org/newsite/content/index.htm to http://www.apopo.org/newsite/content/index.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
You may set the
|checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting
|needhelp= to your help request.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
If you are unable to use these tools, you may set
|needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.