Talk:Gang

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
          This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject Sociology (Rated C-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Organizations (Rated C-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Organizations. If you would like to participate please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Crime  
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
 

Women in gang culture[edit]

I am currently attempting to bring attention to the presence of women in gang culture as part of a class project. In addition to the existence of girl gangs (which I am creating a separate article about), I aim to highlight the role of non-member women in gang life. Specifically, I will explore women’s involvement in gang-related criminal activities and use as “honey traps” (Taylor, 1993, https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=147359). I will also include numbers on the incidence of domestic and sexual violence amongst women affiliated with gangs under the heading “Gang Violence.” I would like to add the women’s involvement section under the heading “Associates or Affiliates,” but I realize that group of subheadings is based around the work of O’Deane and I don’t want to detract from that. If anyone has any suggestions for a relevant caption or existing section I could make my additions under, or any suggestions for my work at all, I would greatly appreciate it.

Hhoover42 (talk) 20:41, 3 October 2014 (UTC)


Definition[edit]

I have placed this in the article: thought and comments?

I have played about with the first bit "A Gang" and added a "Street Gang" and "Organised Crime Group". Criminal Fraternities such as motorcycle clubs and skinheads whilst being referred to as a gang i think do not fall neatly under any definition on this page. I think the Motorcyce Clubs and Racist groups warrant a single page for each as they are much more distinguishable (whilst also being similar) from gangs. To keep it simple:

Motorcycle Clubs - members must own motorcycle Skin Heads/Neo-Nazis - Belief in White being the Superior Race

Street gangs such as Crips, Bloods, Nortenos, Surenos etc.. do not have any definers such as those above. Just about anyone living in the gang neighbourhood can be initiated no matter what their beliefs and possesions are. They do not need anything specific to be a part of the gang and excluding the initiation there is very little they need to do. (although many are ethnically homogenous it is argued this reflects more on social demographics than anything else)

There is no agreed upon definition for a gang, or street gang at least. There are hundreds of definitions that have been debated ever since Thrasher (1927) defined the 1313 gangs he observed in Chicago.

There is little, if any, consensus as to what constitutes a gang and who is a gang member, let alone what gangs do, either inside or outside the law (Ball & Curry, 1995; Decker & Kempf-Leonard, 1991; Gardner, 1993; Klein, 1969; Miller, 1975, 1980; Needle & Stapleton, 1983). When describing their conceptual and operational definitions, many contemporary gang researchers note the absence of definitional consensus.

Suggest to delete this section enclosed in brackets [The irony, of course, is that even the] “experts” cannot agree on what constitutes a gang or gang behavior, and many experts find fault with nearly every definition.

An article in the Journal of Contemporary Justice (Malcolm W. Klein "The Value of Comparisons in Street Gang Research", 2005) talks of a consensus definition developed over 5 years and agreed on by more than 100 gang research scholars in the United States and Europe. It is a minimalist definition specifically designed to enhance comparative street gang research.

“A street gang is any durable, streetoriented youth group whose own identity includes involvement in illegal activity.”

  • “Durable” is a bit ambiguous, but at least several months can be used as a guideline. Many gang-like groups come together and dissipate within a few months. The durability refers to the group, which continues despite turnover of members.
  • “Street-oriented” implies spending a lot of group time outside home, work, and school—often on streets, in malls, in parks, in cars, and so on.
  • “Youth” can be ambiguous. Most street gangs are more adolescent than adult, but some include members in their 20s and even 30s. Most have average ages in adolescence or early 20s.
  • “Illegal” generally means delinquent or criminal, not just bothersome.
  • “Identity” refers to the group, to the collective identity, not the individual self-image. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.45.122.121 (talkcontribs) 17:57, March 2, 2007

WP:Spotlight[edit]

e·h·w·Stock post message.svg To-do:
  • History of gangs
  • Difference between gangs, paramilitaries, and organized crime
  • Economic impact
  • Famous and or infamous (depending on circumstances) acts committed by gangs

External links[edit]

Reversed Passage?[edit]

The following paragraph appears in this article, and in another wiki article here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gang_population The paragraph below is how it appears on the Gang_population page:

The newly released Chicago Crime Commission publication, "The Gang Book 2012", conveyed a startling statistic that Chicago has more gang members than any other city in the United States: 150,000 members[7] Traditionally Los Angeles County was considered the Gang Capital of America, with an estimated 120,000 (41,000 in the City) gang members.[8]

Chicago has a higher rate of gang membership per capita than Los Angeles.[9] The state of Illinois has a higher rate of gang membership (8-11 gang members per 1,000 population) than California (5-7 gang members per 1,000 population).[10]

Notice that it switches Chicago/Illinois with Los Angeles/California, so bizarre since it's basically word for word otherwise. Only one can be right (I think Chicago has more per capita. as it appears in the "Gang" article, chicago has more members but somehow less per capita? LA is bigger than chicago). This article is terrible anyway. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.246.90.191 (talk) 04:10, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

It was vandalized on Sept 26. I have reverted it. Rmhermen (talk) 04:53, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Gang. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

N Archived sources still need to be checked

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:35, 29 August 2015 (UTC)