Talk:Gazeta Wyborcza

Newspapers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Newspapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Newspapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NewspapersWikipedia:WikiProject NewspapersTemplate:WikiProject NewspapersNewspapers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Journalism Low‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Poland Low‑importance

	Poland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Communists?![edit]

Please correct Communists -> Columnists where the contributing authors are listed. This is not exactly funny.

Untitled[edit]

The criticism section is, apart from being less than objective, written unintelligibly. Needs improvement.

The coverage of the criticism is done from a single point of view. Needs improving.77.237.12.150 (talk) 01:06, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It would be nice to have old logo's of the newspaper: the Solidarity one, and wasn't there a short-lived green version too?--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 14:54, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think there's a point in publishing "Gazeta Wyborcza"'s logo while we can have its cover, isn't it? Elisma 11:17, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There is a point in publishing, especially that we do have it. Feel free to add the cover, but don't remove other pics we have here. They might be useful and without them being used in the article nobody will know we have'em. //Halibu tt 12:15, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I stand corrected. However, part of the caption under "Gazeta Wyborcza"'s cover needs to be rewritten - the term "tabloid" pertains not only to the paper's size but more importantly to its content - here's a nice excerpt from Wikipedia's "tabloid" entry: "Recently, three traditionally broadsheet daily newspapers—The Independent, The Times, and The Scotsman—have switched to tabloid size; due to the negative connotations of the label, they generally refer to themselves as being in 'compact' format."

Since the term "compact" is still not widespread and rather vague, I suggest we refer to "Gazeta Wyborcza" simply as a "daily newspaper". Elisma 13:55, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Wysokieobcasy1.jpg[edit]

Image:Wysokieobcasy1.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 11:27, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think describing Gazeta Wyborcza as a tabloid is simply stupid. I accept that the citation points to a book about the European newspaper industry in which the newspaper is so described but it's simply not true. Neither is it a tabloid in the sense of 'gossip daily', nor a 'small-format newspaper'; I suggest the last sentence of the first paragraph should be82.4.147.183 (talk) 06:06, 20 May 2010 (UTC) deleted.[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gazeta Wyborcza. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070304172127/http://www.obp.pl/03-raport/2001/dailies_numb.htm to http://www.obp.pl/03-raport/2001/dailies_numb.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:39, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]