Talk:Geastrum triplex/GA1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Okay, let's get this party started...Casliber (talk · contribs) 10:01, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

  • I'd note something about distribution in the lead. Stuff it, I did it myself.

More later. This one came together nicely, and is over the line for GA. Casliber (talk · contribs) 10:59, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
Prose is fine. Article complies with MOS.
  1. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c(OR):
    Well-referenced to reliable sources.
  2. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    Thorough treatment of all important topics.
  3. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  4. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  5. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    All images have appropriate free use licenses.
  6. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
Pending a couple of revisions.