This article shouldn't be deleted because it is a highly respected podcast. All the information, so far, in this article are correctly sourced and represent the podcast in an educational way. Djsteen 10:25, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
- What I am asking for, and the reason I proposed the deletion, is that sources for people outside of the organisation, voicing their respect for the podcast, be put into the article. I am not saying that the article is in any way incorrect as it is, just that it needs some verification of its status in the community. Cheers, Ansell 12:10, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
The line stating that "I'm not sure, but I think that..." isn't exactly neutral, is it. Can somebody clean it up?