Talk:GenArts, Inc.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Corporate Minion[edit]

Hey, I don't really know what went on in this edit. I'm not sure where the contents, revenue & num_employee that are getting readded was dropped. I didn't remove anything from infobox. What you commented is indeed not spam. In fact, I obtained from Hoover myself and added in previous edit I made. As for your "re adding date"... check again.. the date wasn't removed. I rearranged the sentence, so the date just went in a different position.

Despam was for other insignificant filler contents in the body. See the edit I made [here]

So, what I did is I removed the filler words, I rearranged phrasing, and I added num_employee and revenue based on my research. I did this in one edit, rather than several. I'm not completely done editing just yet and I still think its overtly promotional. Cantaloupe2 (talk) 13:10, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, you probably removed it because according to Hoovers they have 8 employees! I have used Hoovers before as a marketing professional - it is not a reliable source even for corporate headquarters addresses or other basic facts. They are certainly much larger than that. Corporate 13:31, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well, Hoovers is a well established source for company profile. Just as I'm expected to provide beyond "because I know" for fact, do you have something to refute they're wrong before you remove it? Cantaloupe2 (talk) 13:46, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]