Talk:Generation II reactor

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Energy (Rated Stub-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Stub-Class article Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Is the first sentence meant to read 'evolutionary' as opposed to revolutionary?

There is no such thing as a en II or Gen I. Gen IV was dubbed by the DOE for developing new plant types in 2000 [1]. In 2003 the French CEA was referring to Gen II types in Nucleonics Week, "Etienne Pochon, CEA director of nuclear industry support, outlined EPR's improved performance and enhanced safety features compared to the advanced Generation II designs on which it was based." (Vol. 44, No. 39; Pg. 7) . But The first thing there was was Gen IV. The rest is a ex-post fabrication. -- Eiland (talk) 09:03, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

Generation I, II, and II were proposed as nomenclature when Generation IV was introduced. It is "ex-post"--Work permit (talk) 04:46, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Generation I link loops back to current page. Anthony 1l (talk) 03:15, 29 December 2015 (UTC)