Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: BrickHouse337 (talk · contribs) 21:06, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
- GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
- Fairly well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- Looks good; all of the sources are reliable and verifiable; great job.
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- Fairly well covered as far as focus.
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall, the article is in good article condition. Great work on this article everybody. Pass. --Brick House 337 21:06, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
- As always, thank you very much for your fast and prompt review. It means a lot! Regards, Creativity97 21:18, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
- Wow this happened so quickly, all while I was sleeping! Thankyou so much for your speedy review :) means a lot to us! Arre 03:53, 1 August 2013 (UTC)