Talk:Genevieve Atkinson/GA1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: BrickHouse337 (talk · contribs) 21:06, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    Fairly well written.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  • Looks good; all of the sources are reliable and verifiable; great job.
  1. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    Fairly well covered as far as focus.
  2. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  3. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  4. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  5. Overall:
    Overall, the article is in good article condition. Great work on this article everybody. Pass. --Brick House 337 21:06, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
As always, thank you very much for your fast and prompt review. It means a lot! Regards, Creativity97 21:18, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Wow this happened so quickly, all while I was sleeping! Thankyou so much for your speedy review :) means a lot to us! Arre 03:53, 1 August 2013 (UTC)