Talk:Genome Biology

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Academic Journals (Rated Stub-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Academic Journals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Academic Journals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Stub-Class article Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
 
See WikiProject Academic Journals' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Notability, Primary Sources[edit]

This article is notable, but at present is only a stub. Scientific journals that are peer-reviewed are high-quality primary sources (cf. WP:V#Reliable_sources). And in general, Wikipedia needs information about peer-reviewed scientific journals (see also List of scientific journals, List of medical journals, etc. and see search list+journal.

The question then becomes, is this a good quality journal. Here are some facts about this particular journal:

  • It is supported by advertising (see [1])
  • Searching PubMed for "genome biology" returns 2181 references (so it's cited frequently)
  • It has an impact factor of 6.59, meaning articles published here are cited by others. It should be noted that this isn't always definitive (as some people game the system).
  • They ask submitters disclosed conflicts of interest.[2]
  • All BioMed Central journals are peer-reviewed.[3]
  • This journal has a particular review policy.[4]

Therefore, failing any major objection, I'm removing the tags added here. --InsufficientData (talk) 18:33, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

See also Wikipedia:List_of_missing_journals --InsufficientData (talk) 20:39, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Genome Biology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:20, 9 January 2017 (UTC)