Talk:Geology of the Bryce Canyon area

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Featured article Geology of the Bryce Canyon area is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophy This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on June 16, 2004.
Article milestones
Date Process Result
May 19, 2004 Featured article candidate Promoted
August 13, 2007 Featured article review Kept
Current status: Featured article
          This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject Geology (Rated FA-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon Geology of the Bryce Canyon area is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.
Featured article FA  This article has been rated as FA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject United States / Utah (Rated FA-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Featured article FA  This article has been rated as FA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Utah (marked as Mid-importance).


Is "ampitheatures" a typo? Google give two hits, one of which is this article. Markalexander100 05:22, 16 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Yep. I fixed it. Thanks for the note. --mav 05:49, 16 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Colorado Plateau(s)?[edit]

I believe the correct usage is "Colorado Plateau", not "Colorado Plateaus" as in the article, as it is one geographic feature. Anyone have examples of usage to the contrary? Gwimpey 17:06, 16 Jun 2004 (UTC)

As our Colorado Plateau article states, that North American province is composed of many plateaus. This is also the usage I found in the main reference work for this article, Geology of National Parks. But yes, common usage does prefer the singular and that is why I located the article on the subject at the singular title. But the common usage is strictly not correct and gives an incorrect image about what the region actually is. So there is no reason why we should be incorrect in the dispayed body text and section titles. --mav 03:04, 17 Jun 2004 (UTC)


a mention of where bryce canyon is on this page would be nice.. i know you can click the link to the main page, but...

Done. --mav 03:39, 15 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Automated Review[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • If there is not a free use image in the top right corner of the article, please try to find and include one.[?]
  • There may be an applicable infobox for this article. For example, see Template:Infobox Biography, Template:Infobox School, or Template:Infobox City.[?] (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), there should be a non-breaking space -   between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of 4 feet, use 4 feet, which when you are editing the page, should look like: 4 feet.[?]
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), when doing conversions, please use standard abbreviations: for example, miles -> mi, kilometers squared -> km2, and pounds -> lb.[?]
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (headings), headings generally do not start with articles ('the', 'a(n)'). For example, if there was a section called ==The Biography==, it should be changed to ==Biography==.[?]
  • Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
    • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
  • The script has spotted the following contractions: didn't, if these are outside of quotations, they should be expanded.
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.[?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, Davnel03 21:22, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

Nice article[edit]

Hadn't looked in for awhile. Very informative article. Good work! Thanks, Pete Tillman (talk) 14:33, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for the compliment! :) --mav (reviews needed) 03:01, 22 May 2011 (UTC)