Talk:Geospatial summary of the High Peaks/Summits of the Juneau Icefield

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Should this article explain why this information is important?[edit]

@Kirkjamesmiller: - This article was just highlighted as one of the most edited Wikipedia articles of the year. There's obviously a compelling reason you've spent so much time updating this article in such painstaking detail. Can you enlighten us and the general Wikipedia audience what the significance of this information is? I'm not a geologist and I think a succinct summary sentence or two might bring more benefit to your audience than the wealth of statistical data you've provided.Timtempleton (talk) 18:29, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I bet this was done by script. The sources are all databases, and each edit is just a single point of data. So I can imagine a type of scraping program that grabs a single piece of data, calls the right URLs on wikipedia to edit the page, and then save that one change. --Scottjduffy (talk) 17:20, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The edits were added at a fast & furious, yet steady pace, with large edits coming in one after another in a matter of minutes or seconds even. Perhaps at some point this page will be submitted for a GA review. That should be interesting... - theWOLFchild 04:52, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this article ended after the "High Peaks Summary," it would be an adequate article. Including the actual survey results is equivalent to including the entire text of "War and Peace" in an article on that novel. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.222.33.149 (talk) 22:07, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Geospatial summary of the High Peaks/Summits of the Juneau Icefield. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:09, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Geospatial summary of the High Peaks/Summits of the Juneau Icefield. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:21, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]