Talk:German destroyer Z8 Bruno Heinemann

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Good article German destroyer Z8 Bruno Heinemann has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
Date Process Result
April 27, 2011 Good article nominee Listed
Did You Know

Comments[edit]

Hi, per the request on WP:MHA I have assessed the article. It looks like a solid B class article to me. I noticed two things that you might consider tweaking:

  • the last sentence in the Career section could probably be tightened up. For instance: "Only 93 men were not rescued by the other destroyers, although five of the 234 survivors later died of their wounds." This could probably be reworded to: "98 members of the ship's crew lost their lives: 93 were lost at sea, while another five, who had originally been among the 234 men rescued, died of their wounds";
  • in the Notes there is "Groener" but in the References it is "Gröner". This should probably be consistent. AustralianRupert (talk) 09:25, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:German destroyer Z8 Bruno Heinemann/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Harrison49 (talk) 15:16, 27 April 2011 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
    The article maintains a good style and layout throughout.
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
    The article is well referenced.
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
    The article covers the major aspects.
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
    The article maintains a neutral point of view.
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
    The article does not appear to be subject to edit warring.
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
    The sole image used is within the public domain under United States law.
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    A very informative article. Harrison49 (talk) 18:48, 27 April 2011 (UTC)