Talk:Go – The Very Best of Moby

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Electronic music Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was PAGE NOT MOVED -- as there was no consensus for the move per discussion below. --Philip Baird Shearer 10:55, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I propose moving this article to Go - the very best of Moby. If you check the official website, that's how it's written. --Evil Eccentric 23:12, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to go ahead and do it, since nobody seems to disagree with the proposal. --Evil Eccentric 23:26, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

1) You left double redirects all over the place 2) If there's a dash in the article title, it should probably be an en dash rather than a hyphen 3) I really don't care one way or another, but I'm reverting the move on the basis of 1) and 2) above. Duja► 09:43, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine. I think it's stupid though that double redirects aren't automatic. --Evil Eccentric 23:14, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Objection to move, WP:MOSCL, WP:NC and their subsections. Chris cheese whine 13:44, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe I read WP:NC wrong:

“

In band names and titles of songs or albums, unless it is unique, the standard rule in the English language is to capitalize words that are the first or the last word in the title and those that are not conjunctions (and, but, or, nor, for), prepositions (in, to, over), articles (an, a, the), or the word to when used to form an infinitive.

”

Doesn't that mean that, if a CD has a special naming convention, it's used? I know there's a problem at decemberunderground, but I didn't want to even get involved in that. And, also, I apologize for my mistakes; I'm not used to doing major changes. --Evil Eccentric 23:14, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I can't follow this discussion, but I like the page at Go: The Very Best of Moby, its current location. GassyGuy 00:40, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Evil Eccentric next time you make a requested move please include the move template at the top of the talk page. --Philip Baird Shearer 10:55, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Go very best of moby.jpg[edit]

Image:Go very best of moby.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:19, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]