the link to answers is to verify (tho not cited as a reference) that that is what a goofball is. "what is a goofball?" is the question a this page should answer.
this is more of a concern (for me) regarding any internal link to the page, not as much as with visitors who land on this page from outside wikipedia. please do not brush aside or poo poo such a concern: wikipedians tend to these links. the rest of the world and google can figure out the rest and they usu do alright job. (see seo). HeadsCanBeLargelyAkin2Wholes 17:53, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
- Your opinion on what you like is unfortunately not an issue for Wikipedia to resolve. The page is not a disambiguation page and as currently structured violates the Wikipedia guidelines, as per my original edit summary. I am restoring my edit. Feel free to take this to any form of meditation, although I think it's pretty clear that the page as it stands prior to my revision is inappropriate. In the future when reverting pages, you should also consider checking to see if you are restoring vandalism, as you did here. -- Michael Devore (talk) 04:13, 14 July 2009 (UTC)