From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


I think this CSD nomination is inappropriate. The article is well-organized, the subject is notable, and sources are provided.  Frank  |  talk  19:51, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

I'm unsure this qualifies as notable. There is a lack of significant coverage of the topic, and there are errant/unsupported claims made. There are hundreds of such events in the country. It's claimed in the article that this is the largest event of its kind in the US, which is factually incorrect (the Midwest Renewable Energy Association Fair is), and the stated source does not confirm this claim either. The links are questionable, as there is substantial commercial content on them. I think DMOZ, the open directory, would better site from which to link this event.--E8 (talk) 20:03, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

  • Then the appropriate place for you to take this would be prod (which I will decline), and then AfD. CSD A7 is incorrect. MrPrada (talk) 20:06, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
    • Request withdrawn. The NYT article did not support the "largest" claim. Was that from another one of the sources?--E8 (talk) 20:09, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
      • Yes, it was from another website. After careful reading I think it was a bit of an exaggerated claim on their part. There are numerous sources for this, I will try and get some others up. MrPrada (talk) 20:11, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
        • Ok, nice work. Apologies for not noticing your recent construction and templating you :/. I've reverted all related changes I made.--E8 (talk) 20:15, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
          • That's alright, I should have placed a {{underconstruction}} tag at the top of the page. Thank you for patrolling new pages, hopefully we can contribute and take this stub and make it even better. MrPrada (talk) 20:17, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Greasestock. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:37, 22 October 2017 (UTC)