Talk:Great Captain Island Light

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Great Captain Island Light/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Acalycine (talk · contribs) 02:29, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):


Comment: Certainly an interesting article about lighthouses, I liked the amount of history put into the article, well done. Acalycine(talk/contribs) 02:54, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

Symbol support vote.svg · Symbol oppose vote.svg · Symbol wait.svg · Symbol neutral vote.svg
Thank you. This was a fun and surprisingly interesting lighthouse. Normally, one does not expect a stone lighthouse to be severely cracked just a decade into its service life, but the replacement certainly has made up for the hassle I'd say! ChrisGualtieri (talk) 03:10, 12 April 2014 (UTC)