Talk:Guinevere Planitia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Solar System (Rated C-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Solar System, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Solar System on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
 
For more information, see the Solar System importance assessment guideline.

Looks good, couple of improvements I'd suggest:

  1. I'd try to break up the Volcanology section into subsections with the different features. Big walls of text aren't very reader friendly.
  2. You've got a big map of Venus showing the various textures, if you could pinpoint on the map where this quadrangle is located it would be helpful.
  3. More internal linking to other Wiki pages. I had forgotten what exactly a lobate flow was, so if you could link to its Wiki page where lobate flows were referenced it would be a big help.

Jamgreene (talk) 19:58, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

Improvements on wiki page[edit]

Hey Kohl, your page looks pretty good so far. A few improvements: [1] Volcanology section seems a little crowded, if possible, maybe you could break it up into one or two more sections. [2] On the second figure, perhaps you could better explain exactly what it is we are looking at or where the Guinevere Planitia is. [3] For some reason the page is saying this article does not cite any references or sources although I see you have plenty of them, check that out. Looks good though. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rfox8 (talkcontribs) 04:49, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

Suggestions from Orlando Guerra[edit]

Hey Kohl. The article is good; I like it. Some things you could work on are: [1.] Try to link some of your terms to their corresponding wiki page. Some terms I'd probably want to look up to get a better understanding, especially in your volcanism subsection; [2.] your volcanism section had a lot of info, but your terrain section had hardly any. Maybe you could talk a little more about the terrain; and [3.] I assume the big picture is all of Venus. Maybe you could label the general area you were talking about. All in all it looks like a great start. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oguerr1 (talkcontribs) 12:52, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

Map and comments by Graeme Bartlett[edit]

Hi, since this is a map region it would make sense to have a map of it showing the major named features. Also the coordinates have a very wide extent, so coordinates of each corner of the rectangle would be good. Instead of all the references being at the end of a section, try to spread them through, after the first sentence that needs that reference. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:01, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Live Suggestions[edit]

Your page looks really good. Lots of information and diagrams to help reinforce your topic. Only thing I could think of a possible improvement is maybe use thumbnails instead of an entire picture? It looks great as is, though. Jamgreene (talk) 01:14, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Suggestions Pt. 2[edit]

Hey the page looks really good. Adding all the pictures really help, a lot info on each subject matter is good, and lots of internal links. The only thing that might make it better is to have a small caption under each picture explaining what it is. I know you refer to them within your paragraphs but I think having small captions would help, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oguerr1 (talkcontribs) 12:40, 8 April 2014 (UTC)