Talk:Gun safety

Pamvic merge

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

In the absence of any references despite searching, propose Pamvic for deletion rather than merge. Klbrain (talk) 16:07, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

---

The Pamvic is a stub article covering a set of gun safety rules. It doesn't seem especially notable on its own, so I suggest it'd be best to merge it into this article. Rezin (talk) 18:31, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

I don't see a need even to merge this stub here. The content of the stub is not documented, i.e., there are no references, and, additionally, it does not seem particularly informative, with a good bit of stretching of an acronym that simply does not appear to work. ("Instruct"? Really?) I don't see the value in even preserving the stub, let alone moving it here. Miguel Escopeta (talk) 18:48, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

Yeah, I tried to find a reference for that material but I'm coming up empty. Maybe it should just be deleted instead. Rezin (talk) 18:50, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

Unless some sources can be drummed up, I too think it should be deleted instead. Besides, the points covered in Pamvic are already found in this article. --Stratocaster27^t@lk 22:32, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

I've found a couple of sources - it turns out the article was misnamed and the real mnemonic is PAMVICKS. Even so, it's not worth having as a standalone. I'll source it and merge the content in with the other rules. Rezin (talk) 20:37, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Looks like Rezin last edited in March 2015, so this plan seems to have stalled. I also have tried searching and can't find any references that aren't circular Klbrain (talk) 15:54, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Treat firearms as if they are loaded

There is a complaint on this section about a lack of sources. There must be something by Jeff Cooper that claims this. It is common sense.

Can we cite cases of negligent discharges, like that of Chicago guitarist Terry Kath?

JHowardGibson (talk) 18:09, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Gun safety. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.geocities.com/rbeaufoy/verses.html
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m3197/is_11_43/ai_53377562/
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m3197/is_n11_v39/ai_16467222/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120425143747/http://www.nwpublichealth.org/docs/nph/f2009/gomez_fw2009.pdf to http://www.nwpublichealth.org/docs/nph/f2009/gomez_fw2009.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

As of February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete the "External links modified" sections if they want, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{sourcecheck}} (last update: 15 July 2018).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:56, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Gun safety. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.geocities.com/rbeaufoy/verses.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080709041233/http://ag.ca.gov/firearms/forms/pdf/chart.pdf to http://www.ag.ca.gov/firearms/forms/pdf/chart.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140407060930/http://www.gunsafeadviser.com/ask-campaign-gun-safety-around-children/ to http://www.gunsafeadviser.com/ask-campaign-gun-safety-around-children/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

As of February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete the "External links modified" sections if they want, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{sourcecheck}} (last update: 15 July 2018).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:51, 26 October 2017 (UTC)