Talk:H. Beatty Chadwick

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Untitled[edit]

This seems to pretty clearly be a puff piece written by his attorneys. Rustinf (talk) 07:23, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

I'm not so sure -- try spending fourteen years in the slammer. If you still feel the same way, I'll agree with you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.170.248.36 (talk) 16:00, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
Puff piece? Man, fuck you. The dude spent FOURTEEN YEARS in jail on a civil contempt charge - the longest anyone has ever served in the history of the world. So piss off! That cost the taxpayers a minumum of apx. $500,000 - not including his FREE healthcare and cancer treatments. I wish my mom had free cancer treatments. We spent almost a million dollars and she still died anyways. If the dude was hiding his money, you'd think that the judge would realize that he wasn't going to give it up after a year or so. So what was the point in keeping him locked up, other then to waste our tax dollars?
I suggest that your mother murder you in a violent and (apparently) gratuitous manner. Then she can enjoy the complimentary free cancer treatments she will receive with her life sentence. And in case she actually gets the death penalty, the joke is still on the judge, as she is dying anyway!
Oh, wait. I see that you mention that your mother is already dead. Nevermind. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.243.104.82 (talk) 01:51, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
I do agree that it seems to be biased. It seems notable, so it should be included. Needs a rewrite. The line "Although never charged with a crime, H. Beatty Chadwick spent fourteen years of his life in prison." is a particularly bad example. Not a puff piece, but it is written like one. 99.6.157.136 (talk) 05:04, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

BIO1E[edit]

This guy is the apotheosis of one-event-hood. At minimum, the article should be renamed to Chadwick v. Janecka (focus on the event, not the person). Better yet, delete this article and merge a couple sentences into Contempt of court. -- Frankie1969 (talk) 14:17, 8 March 2013 (UTC)