Talk:HNK Hajduk Split

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Football (Rated C-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Croatia (Rated C-class, High-importance)
WikiProject icon HNK Hajduk Split is within the scope of WikiProject Croatia, a collaborative effort to improve the quality and coverage of articles related to Croatia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
Checklist icon
 High  This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
 


Drazen Muzinic[edit]

Hi. I recently set up a page for Drazen Muzinic who played for a while in England. However, I have not been able to get many details of his time with Hajduk Split, and information about him generally is difficult to get hold of! If anyone has any career information that they could add to his article, then please do so. Thanks! User:Demonicanglian 20:38, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

Oldest club?[edit]

I'm removing the bit about Hajduk being Croatia's oldest club. Slaven Belupo from Koprivnica was founded four yeasr earlier, in 1907. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 85.10.50.73 (talk) 09:29:48, August 19, 2007 (UTC)

Actually, HNK Segesta is the oldest Croatian football club, established in 1906. Timbouctou (talk) 03:16, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit]

Shouldn't the official logo have 19 11 instead of the four white lines on its sides? --DIREKTOR (TALK) 10:22, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

That's usually a contentious subject, but since the official website has the lines, it seems like a safer bet.--Thewanderer (talk) 21:21, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
I see, thanks. --DIREKTOR (TALK) 22:02, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
So I'm not going crazy? I always thought the 1911 shirts were authentic and the lines were counterfit, who knows. 66.183.85.242 (talk) 22:50, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
Actually the club can be seen using both versions (for instance the logo in their official web pages has lines, while the giant one painted on the seats at Poljud and the one painted at their offices still features the 1911 digits. Timbouctou (talk) 20:45, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Molim?[edit]

"It was the second most successful club in Yugoslavia far outstripping the third, its present day rival, Dinamo Zagreb." What the...?! The two Belgrade teams won more titles, which certainly makes Hajduk third, and Dinamo fourth. And they didn't really outstrip Dinamo, after WW2 Hajduk won 7 titles compared to Dinamo's 4. They did win another two titles in the old Yugoslavia, but neither Dinamo, Red Star or Partizan existed back then. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zhelja (talkcontribs) 00:30, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

He is right. Do something about it. You cant use some fanatic source that states that. Even the sentence "its the only club with supporters of all nationalities" is not correct. I have been in various regions of ex Yugoslavia and Red Star and specially Partizan can also say that. Lets not lie. Hajduk is a great club and dosn´t need this kind of megalomania. OK? FkpCascais (talk) 02:12, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

Honours[edit]

You should include in the honours section that Hajduk won the championship of Banovina Croatia in 1941 and the championship of Socialist Republic of Croatia in 1946. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.129.96.21 (talk) 16:20, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

...[edit]

You should include in the honours section that Hajduk won the championship of Banovina Croatia in 1941 and the championship of Socialist Republic of Croatia in 1946. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.129.90.145 (talk) 13:36, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Copy editing[edit]

I have again restored the maintenance template. User:Sexymisterr was blocked in the past for removing this without addressing the issue, and has done so again. Text such as "80s and have been offered less success in the country (no title), " as currently present in the article, is not English, and needs attention. Greenman (talk) 22:08, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

Popularity[edit]

A controversial issue such as which club is the most popular in Croatia should NOT be based on a 6 years old article from a news website whose standard can be questionable, about a poll based upon an unknown number of people, without any true references to the findings. I'm changing the sentence to state "one of the two most popular clubs in Croatia" which is true, and won't annoy anyone except for fanatics on both sides. Zlopseto 16:14 22 May 2011 (UTC)

OK but if you choose the wording "one of the two most popular clubs" you are also supposed to tell the reader which club is the other one. Regards. Timbouctou (talk) 15:23, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

Relegation[edit]

"The 1960s were some of the hardest times in Hajduk's history, iincluding one occasion when they were relegated to the second league, but not for long."


This is not true, Hajduk was never relegated from the top divison. I'm removing it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.253.230.99 (talk) 15:18, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

owners[edit]

I think this article should mention that the city council are the majority owners of the team, and that Hajduk Split is financially broke, with the council pumping in 5 million euro — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.245.124.151 (talk) 03:45, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

The club isnt financialy broke its just in a money crisis and the city didnt give any money.The banks gave a 30 million kuna credit and if Hajduk doesnt pay it back in 1 year then the city must pay the credit.((TorcaST))