This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
As a red/green color blind individual, the taxonomy chart under the New APIs section is unreadable. I recommend at least editing the image to use more contrasted colors so color blind folks can read it.
Phrase (this was not part of HTML5 though) unclear as to what it's referring to
The sentence should be clarified or removed. Coreydaj (talk) 05:45, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
WHATWG claims W3C's HTML5 is a "fork" of theirs and not authoritative
I'm on one of WHATWG's mailing lists. I raised an issue of the long-standing and frequently bug-reported conflict between the W3C spec for the <cite>...</cite> element and WHATWG's. I was told:
This clearly does not jibe with what we have written here. I'm wondering if our material is complete/correct, or if I'm being fed a bunch of subjective and inaccurate spin. — SMcCandlish ☺☏¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼ 22:38, 25 August 2017 (UTC)