This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
"HTML5 on its own cannot be used for animation"
So, this statement is completely, on its face, false. An <img> tag that pulls in a .gif is using HTML5 for animation, as is any <video> tag. I know this is semantics, but the statement, and the other one later in the document that says that same thing, definitely need to be reworded so as to make some amount of sense. 188.8.131.52 (talk) 13:34, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
I can see reason to rename HTML5 article to a clearer name (Article element would be our convention so far), to keep it or even to delete it if we don't consider that this new element in isolation meets WP:N. However I see nothing in the middle supporting a merge: it's either worth writing about because the element warrants discussion, or it's a name listed in HTML5 and no more. Andy Dingley (talk) 01:25, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for the suggestions I will think about getting rid of it under CSD A10 or moving it to a new name. Could someone get rid of the merge tags Thanks! Dudel250 (talk) 02:55, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
As a red/green color blind individual, the taxonomy chart under the New APIs section is unreadable. I recommend at least editing the image to use more contrasted colors so color blind folks can read it.