Talk:Haml

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Computer science  
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computer science related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
 

Edit and Update[edit]

- Updated Haml wiki page to meet wiki requirements. Added references to add verification. Edited information such as Features and Examples to improve page content and ensure that the page is not an advertisement.

Deletion[edit]

Having been deleted in an AfD, this article was undeleted as per Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2007 June 3

Discussion[edit]

Haml is a alternative more legible non-XHTML syntax. It is "reversible" in the sense of XSugar?

It is a very interesting language, the Haml's scripts seem more like a "programmable RELAX Compact_syntax" than a tradictional Web template (see formal defs.). What the relationship with Haml and schema specifications (that is not a explicit "core principle")?

-- Krauss 9 December 2006

Haml was designed as a web templating engine and does fit with the rules of one; although HTML isn't valid input like it is for PHP and eRuby, it does fit with all the necessities in the formal definition. Haml isn't really a schema language like RELAX NG or XML Schemas... rather than defining types of XML documents, it defines the documents themselves. Is that what you were asking? -- Nex3, Haml developer December 16, 2006
It was a confuse question about the "inspiration" of Haml, perhaps looking for a "aproximation" between template language and schema ...
After analyzing Halm a little more, it looks very related with CSS (more than with a schema!). It is a very positive feature of the language. A more simple and better question:
"It is, for the developers, a web template system that integrate Style sheet language with the Markup language in the document production process?". --Krauss (talk) 18:26, 10 July 2010 (UTC)


Regarding:

  <div id='content'>
     <div class='entry'>
       <h3 class='title'>Halloween</h3>
       <p class='date'>Tuesday, October 31, 2006</p>
       <p class='body'>
         Happy Halloween, glorious readers! I'm going to a party this evening... I'm very excited.
       </p>
     </div>
     <div class='entry'>
       <h3 class='title'>New Rails Templating Engine</h3>
       <p class='date'>Friday, August 11, 2006</p>
       <p class='body'>
         There's a very cool new Templating Engine out for Ruby on Rails. It's called Haml.
       </p>
     </div>
   </div>

I don't see any way to derive these entry instances from the HAML code. —pxhayes —Preceding undated comment added 21:12, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

"- @entries.each do |entry|"
This line iterates over 'entries', which is an array of blog posts clearly specified elsewhere. Maybe someone more familiar with HAML could improve the article to make this more clear? 89.243.247.140 (talk) 15:21, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

Criticisms[edit]

I removed the "criticisms and disadvantages" section. Many of the things listed weren't 100% clear disadvantages or commonly accepted fact and they were all unsourced. Much of it appeared to be the opinion of a single editor, so it didn't seem appropriate to keep.

--XaXXon (talk) 18:26, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

Well, I'm glad there's a history function on Wikipedia, as all of those removed comments were relevant and accurate.173.164.79.209 (talk) 20:39, 22 October 2010 (UTC)