Talk:Hannibal

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Article milestones
Date Process Result
June 19, 2006 WikiProject peer review Reviewed
June 28, 2006 Peer review Reviewed
September 26, 2006 WikiProject A-class review Not approved
edit·history·watch·refresh Stock post message.svg To-do list for Hannibal:

This article mentions around 217 BC he "executing the first recorded turning movement in military history". I was wondering if the author(s) could compare this as well: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Guiling

Thank you.

Art: Hannibal Crossing the Alps[edit]

Regarding the color illustration of "Hannibal Crossing the Alps": it is clearly not a painting but rather an old book illustration. However, no source, no book title, author's name, or illustrator's name is given. I suspect from the artistic style that both the book and the illustration are no longer under copyright, but Wiki needs to be sure. The lack of source and artist credit is disturbing merely from a reference/encyclopedia point of view.

Regarding the illustration of "Hannibal Crossing the Alps"; the "Alps" weren't named until the 1600s AD. Othelllo (talk) 18:06, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

...And? Sapphorain (talk) 00:24, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

Cannae[edit]

Considering the military achievements of Trebia,Lake Trasimene and Canaae. I think their should be some description of the actual battles.

Cannae[edit]

Considering the military achievements of Trebia,Lake Trasimene and Canaae. I think their should be some description of the actual battles. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.15.5.23 (talk) 14:10, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

Confusions[edit]

There have been many confusions over which war Hannibal fought in, the main argument is; did he fight in the first or Second Punic War? I have recently edited the article to say that he fought in the Second, I know this from many sources and logically deduced that he could not have possible fought in the first Punic war. The First Punic War was 264 - 241 BC, Hannibal had only been born in 247 BC, and could not have commanded or fought at the age of six. — Preceding unsigned comment added by HistoryAddict2000 (talkcontribs) 20:13, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Gee, thanks for sorting that one out! The only problem is that the sentence was about his father. Paul B (talk) 20:29, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Exile (195–183/181 BC)[edit]

The two last sentences of this paragraph, if correct, are misplaced: at this point of the story, Hannibal is dead! Sapphorain (talk) 10:16, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

Patronym[edit]

I'm not saying Wandalstouring or Ameling were lying, but it's uncommon enough to see the guy called "Hannibal Barca" instead of "Hannibal". Absolutely nothing at Google Books, the Internet Archive, &c. back him up that this guy was commonly called "Hannibal Barca son of Hamilcar Barca". It's more likely that what was intended was "Hannibal son of Hamilcar". That's common enough that we don't have to remove it as but I still don't see it treated as a real patronym or see any Carthaginian sources for its use. It'd be good if someone could check the source to see if it's being misrepresented or has any further sources for this idea.

If it's not just hogwash, we also need the Punic form of the name. I assume it would be something close to TRQLMḤ NB LʻBNḤ but that's based on Hebrew and there might have been some other way to say it in Punic. — LlywelynII 05:21, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Hannibal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Question? Archived sources still need to be checked

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:23, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Syphilis[edit]

I support removing Willis speculation about syphilis which is clearly made invalid by the epidemiological history of that disease which did not exist in the old world in this period. The speculation is not important or notable enough to warrant inclusion in spite of its being clearly mistaken.·maunus · snunɐɯ· 12:58, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

  • On one hand, the source offered for the assertion that Hannibal had syphilis is one that I cannot find anywhere. Does this exist, and does it say what the editor says it does: Willis, T.E, 'Ancient Warfare re-examined: a Post-Structural Marxist Critique', p.228, 1968, Oxford University Press, ISBN 1405125683. I cannot find this source existing anywhere. Just as importantly, I cannot find other sources that repeat the speculation. It does now seem that it is at least possible that syphilis existed in the Old World during Hannibals' lifetime, see Southern Europe: International Dictionary of Historic Places by Trudy Ring, Noelle Watson & Paul Schellinger. Routledge (2013), p. 424. But this assertion, if the source actually exists and actually makes this assertion, is still unsupported WP:FRINGE WP:SPECULATION. I think even offering the barest mention -- any mention at all -- of such an unsupported assertion is automatically WP:UNDUE. I strongly advise that we do not include any mention of it it in the article.  Lingzhi ♦ (talk) 13:01, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
That handbook is not a reliable source for the presence or absence of syphilis in the old world. Try to read the introduction to History of syphilis - the pre-columbian hypothesis has been all but abandoned.·maunus · snunɐɯ· 13:27, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
Agreed. I wasn't mentioning it as a source of support for the syphilis assertion; I was trying to inoculate this discussion against other editors doing so.  Lingzhi ♦ (talk) 13:30, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
Yes I agree with both editors above. In fact I am very suspicious of the suppossed source (I can find no mention of either the author or the work cited, I think it might be a hoax). Even if this were to turn out to be a reliable source, being in apparent conflict with current scientfic consensus, it would require some supporting sources. Paul August 13:24, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
The text was added here, by an IP with no other edits. I think this is probably a bit of sneaky vandalism. Paul August 13:31, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
If so it is actually quite humorous. The title alone being "Ancient Warfare re-examined: a Post-Structural Marxist Critique". ·maunus · snunɐɯ· 14:28, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
But you see, I would never put any kind of elephant-sized academic absurdity past anyone who is a self-proclaimed post-structuralist. I would not even bat an eye if the article were genuine. So it must be investigated...  Lingzhi ♦ (talk) 15:05, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
It is cited as a book published by OUP and there are no internet hits whatsoever with the title. That screams hoax to me. I am by the way a self-proclaimed post-structuralist.·maunus · snunɐɯ· 15:31, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
You are? Well then, you have the correct knowledge base to evaluate this particular incident. Ta!  Lingzhi ♦ (talk) 15:48, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Hannibal Barca Coin[edit]

Does anybody know the origin of this Hannibal Barca coin and if it was a contemporary portrayal of him? I can't really find any information on it and Wikicommons doesn't give any particulars about the coin. TheAstuteObserver (talk) 10:38, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

No one (yet) knows what Hannibal Barca looks like because of the [Battle of Carthage] where [Carthage] was destroyed circa 149 BCE. Othelllo (talk) 18:19, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

Hannibal as Black African[edit]

I suppressed this section, providing an exact copy of a blog post [1] in approximate English, containing an unsourced claim, and illustrated by three images from commons titled "Hannibal", but for which title no satisfactory source is provided.Sapphorain (talk) 22:12, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Hannibal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Question? Archived sources still need to be checked

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:19, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Traversette[edit]

"Our international team, led by Bill Mahaney of York University in Toronto, have finally provided solid evidence for the most likely transit route: a pass called the Col de Traversette. This narrow pass between a row of peaks is located on the border slightly south-east of Grenoble in France and south-west of Turin in Italy. Our findings are published in Archaeometry.

"The Traversette – found at about 3000m above sea level – is a torturous path even today. The route was first proposed over a century ago by the biologist and polymath Sir Gavin de Beer, but was not previously widely accepted by the academic community.

"Up to this point, many scholars have instead favoured other routes across such as the Col du Clapier, about 2400m high and further north, which is certainly less treacherous today. This popular choice was largely down to the writings of both modern and ancient historians such as Livy, who lived in Padua around 200 years after the historical event but never actually visited the site of the crossing in his lifetime. So it may be that many of Livy's accounts are more fictional than factual." [1]

Kortoso (talk) 16:39, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hannibal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Question? Archived sources still need to be checked

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:05, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

  1. ^ http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2016-04-05/ancient-horse-dung-bacteria-is-helping-to-show-where-hannibal-crossed-the-alps