Talk:Haplogroup E-Z827

Fregel et al 2009[edit]

Here are the Moroccans samples used by Fregel et al 2009 for the NWA category (221 individuals)

a) Bosch et al 2001

40 southern Moroccan Berbers
44 Moroccan Arabs
63 north-central Moroccan Berbers

-->you should shows frequncies of each group of these people .

Yes, here are the percentages in Bosch et al 2001 :

SM Berbers -> 26/40 =65%
M Arabs ->23/44 = 52.3%
NCM Berbers ->41/63= 65%

the credibility of this outdated study is not even sure ! completly different to many studies

Galician77 (talk) 18:55, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

b) Flores et al. 2001 -->was not referenced for the other popualtion over genetic articles on wikipedia

74 Moroccans

-->we don't know from where these samples are from ..

Yes, but this is not mandatoryGalician77 (talk) 19:03, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

these samples are Italian Immigrants labled for Moroccans . and Immigrants does not even represent the genetic sturcture of any nation . hence many people from algeria mauretania senagal egypt and lybia pretend to be moroccans in italy and spain.

the credibility of this study should be rejected — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.141.135.21 (talk) 19:45, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

--> Total 221 Moroccans Galician77 (talk) 17:35, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Onofri et al. 2008[edit]

Regarding Onofri et al. 2008 it has nothing to do with Zalloua (and even if it was the case it would not change anything). Only Italians geneticists.

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1875176808002059 Galician77 (talk) 17:35, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Here are the references for Onofri et al 2008 and Zalloua is not cited. Samples are different. Tunisians analysed by Onofri are immigrants.

hence you have prefered these Immigrants as Natives ??? even more Onofri and many others are cited in pierre zalloua study

They are tunisian and Morrocan immigrants in Italy but all are native from Morroco and Tunisia. Your Zalloua samples are different and not tested for M81 (only E1b1b1 M35)Galician77 (talk) 19:38, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

References [1] Italian National Institute of Statistics, http://demo.istat.it/str2005/index. html. [2] International Forensic Y Chromosome User Group, Y chromosome haplotype reference database (YHRD): update, Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 1 (2) (2007) 83–87. [3] V. Onofri, F. Alessandrini, C. Turchi, et al., Development of multiplex PCRs for evolutionary and forensic applications of 37 human Y chromosome SNPs, Forensic Sci. Int. 157 (2006) 23–35. [4] F. Cruciani, R. La Fratta, P. Santolamazza, et al., Phylogeographic analysis of haplogroup E3b (E-M215) Y chromosomes reveals multiple migratory events within and out of Africa, Am. J. Hum. Genet. 74 (5) (2004) 1014– 1022. [5] B. Arredi, E.S. Poloni, S. Paracchini, et al., A predominantly neolithic origin for Y-chromosomal DNA variation in North Africa, Am. J. Hum. Genet. 75 (2) (2004) 338–345. [6] O. Semino, C. Magri, G. Benuzzi, et al., Origin, diffusion, and differentiation ofY-chromosome haplogroups E and J: inferences on the neolithization of Europe and later migratory events in the Mediterranean area, Am. J. Hum. Genet. 74 (5) (2004) 1023–1034. [7] F. Di Giacomo, F. Luca, L.O. Popa, et al., Y chromosomal haplogroup J as a signature of the post-neolithic colonization of Europe, Hum. Genet. 115 (5) (2004) 357–371. [8] V. Onofri, F. Alessandrini, C. Turchi, et al., Y-chromosome genetic structure in sub-Apennine populations of Central Italy by SNP and STR analysis, Int. J. Legal Med. 121 (3) (2007) 234–237. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Galician77 (talk • contribs) 19:29, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

references and stuff[edit]

This article starts from a copy of material in E1b1b, but that older article has developed a lot of template errors in the references over the years, basically caused by good intentioned editors adding material without checking to see if they had broken the referencing links. This means that references in the text do not link to the bibliography. I am just doing an overhaul of that article, so editors of this article might want to bring some of that work over to here. In many cases you can probably copy the references over.--Andrew Lancaster (talk) 10:28, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

E-Z827 upgrade of this Article[edit]

This article was originally intended for E-M81, a sub-sub clade of E-Z827, but has been recently changed to cover all of E-Z827, therefore I have corrected the downstream clades shown for E-Z827 in the main page, and copied the section from the main E1b1b1 page for E-Z830, i.e. the sibling clade of E-V257. Origins section still needs major improvement! There is no published information on this newly found mutation, E-Z827, so place and time of origin are speculative, please adjust accordingly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mermari (talk • contribs) 15:34, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This raises another bigger issue. WP does not need to have an article for every haplogroup, only the most published about. So the above edit is technically correct, but only if you think that this article's subject should change due to a name change amongst all haplogroups. Personally I think WP will soon need to convert ALL human Y haplogroup article names to SNP based names. Otherwise the names and the subjects are not linked in a stable way anymore and we are going to have a real mess.--Andrew Lancaster (talk) 12:11, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It was not my intention to create a mess but I was rather trying to clean it up, sorry if it came out that way.

The 3 main subclades of E1b1b1 that (a) Have been identified for the longest time and (b) dominate in overall global frequency representation of E1b1b1 (>85%) are E-M78, E-M123 and E-M81 thus it would be logical for these articles to have their own pages linked to the main E1b1b page as not only more research has been published with respect to these lineages but more people within E1b1b would likely belong in them rather than the remaining subclades of E1b1b. I would therefore be ok with just these 3 lineages and specifically only these 3 lieages (m123,m78 and m81) being referenced, with possibly even a separate page for E-M293 as well since we have also a relatively extensive amount of data on that lineage as well.

An alternative would be to reference the 4 major phylogenetic 'forks' of the E-M35 lineage, i.e V68, Z827, V6 and V92, this would also be reasonably acceptable, the problem with this however is that these pages will not contain just specifics on the 3 'major' lineages but will need to consider other sibling clades of the most frequent lineages.

I am ok with any one of these scenarios, as long as they are both consistent. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mermari (talk • contribs) 19:53, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Now that it has been discovered that haplogroup E-Z827 consists of two branches, what do you think if two separate pages are created, one for E-L19 and the other for E-Z830, given that their history and dispersion are different?~~JeanCamus~~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by JeanCamus (talk • contribs) 16:52, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on Haplogroup E-Z827. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:58, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Commercial.[edit]

@Skllagyook: Hi, howcome? --Yomal Sidoroff-Biarmskii (talk) 21:05, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Sidoroff-B and Yomal Sidoroff-Biarmskii: In your addition you wrote that almost all commercial cases of the haplogroup E-V1515 were from Arabia, but that did not seem to appear in the source you added (here: [[1]]). Where does it say that?. The tree in the source does not seem to include examples of the E-V1515 branch (iIit odes, can you point out where?. If the source does not explicitly support the addition, it cannot be included (that would be WP:OR, which is against Wikipedia policies. And even if your statement were true of this sample group, it might not necessarily be true of all sample groups of the of the haplogroup collected by all commercial companies (it would seems uncertain that the link contains a complete list). Skllagyook (talk) 21:29, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Skllagyook: At the moment YFull doesn't differentiate between V1515 and CTS10880 branches, so this is the same branch. You can just search for V1515 there to see that it is the same branch.

My point was to mention its abundance in Arabia like with the V42. --Yomal Sidoroff-Biarmskii (talk) 21:42, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Sidoroff-B and Yomal Sidoroff-Biarmskii: I will do a search to see if I can see what you mean/will try to verify that, and get back to you, but at the moment that interpretation looks a bit like WP:OR. Skllagyook (talk) 21:48, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Sidoroff-B and Yomal Sidoroff-Biarmskii: Here is a YFull link (here: [[2]]) that seems to show E-V1515. While many of the cases it shows are from Arabia, a sifnificant minority are also from East Africa (especially Kenya). I'm not sure the phrase "almost all" is justified. It could be said that "several instances of E-B1515 have also been found in Arabia." or something along those lines. As mentioned YFull may not be an exaustive list of allcommercially acquired samples (I also noticed that it, or parts of it, are somewhat outdated). Also, I am not entirely sure that YFull is a reliable source according to Wikipedia policies (I think it might be but I should probably check). Skllagyook (talk) 21:59, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Skllagyook: Because you're looking at an old version of YFull. However, you can see that the next SNP defining this branch is CTS10880. So, you can see the link I provided. --Yomal Sidoroff-Biarmskii (talk) 22:11, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Historic Berber gene-flow in & out of Iberia, regarding Cuban Y-DNA[edit]

The Berbers entered Iberia in two episodes of Iberian history as armies which left a bigger impact, compared to the Arabian ruling class lineages.

8th-10th century (Inbound >>> Berber armies occupied Northwest-Midwest Iberia), in the early stages Berbers were not allowed in Al-Andalus proper & were given NW frontier regions Duero-Galicia, while Al-Andalus proper remained populated by the Iberian & a small Arabian population.

12th-13th century (Inbound >>> Berber armies occupied Andalusia) the Berbers forced occupied Andalusian territories (Iberian Muslims) who were facing Castile-Aragon from the North & the Berber armies from the South.

14th-16th century (Outbound >>> North Africa - New World) Berbers were targeted first as military elements, converted mixed Iberian Berbers along with native Andalusians & other minorities Arab/Jewish were more eager to start a new life in the New World, this explains the atypical Y-DNA frequencies in Cubans & Puerto Ricans when the additional Sub-Saharan African & Native Y-DNA is subtracted from the Iberian Y-DNA.Riffsseed (talk) 09:58, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

E-PF2431 subclade.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:37, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]