Talk:Health care in Cuba
|↓||Skip to table of contents||↓|
|This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Health care in Cuba article.|
|Discussions on this page often lead to previous arguments being restated. Please read recent comments and look in the archives before commenting.
|This is not a forum for general discussion about Health care in Cuba. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Health care in Cuba at the Reference desk, discuss relevant Wikipedia policy at the Village pump, or ask for help at the Help desk.|
|This article is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. Click [show] for further details.|
|This talk page is automatically archived by MiszaBot I. Any threads with no replies in 60 days may be automatically moved. Sections without timestamps are not archived.|
Starvation is good for you?
This section makes me wonder:
Malnutrition created epidemics, but it had positive effects too. Manuel Franco describes the Special Period as "the first, and probably the only, natural experiment, born of unfortunate circumstances, where large effects on diabetes, cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality have been related to sustained population-wide weight loss as a result of increased physical activity and reduced caloric intake".
New England Journal of Medicine has an article this week (free access):
Perspective: A Different Model — Medical Care in Cuba
Edward W. Campion, M.D., and Stephen Morrissey, Ph.D.
N Engl J Med 2013; 368:297-299
January 24, 2013DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp1215226
The first paragraph sentence "AIDS is only one-sixth as common on a per-capita basis as in the United States" is a non-sequeter since AIDS prevalence is tied to risky behavior, not improvements in medical care. The sentence is being used to provide evidence that Cuba's healthcare has improved since 1960 despite having no relation to this fact. Request removal of this sentence. --Memarshall (talk) 08:15, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
The Lancet, Volume 383, Issue 9914, Pages 294 - 295, 25 January 2014 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60090-8
Cuba's economic reforms prompt debate about health care
"Present" section features factual inconsitancies.
The section labelled "Present" features a table of figures ranking Cuba on various health related criteria. This section is attributed to "factbook" which is a CIA produced document. I call into question the neutrality of an organisation that has spent half a century spreading anti-Cuban propaganda and trying to destroy the Cuban regime. The table itself links to other wikipedia articles on the subject, which provide more up to date figures (2011 instead of 2003-2006) from more relaiable sources (WHO, UNICEF). These figures contradict those from the CIA, where the CIA had Cuba at 125/167 for AIDs prevelance, UNICEF has 52/169.
Even the CIA estimates given in this article are wrong (or out dated), the CIA 2013 estimates have Cuba at 44/225 for lowest infant mortality, where the article has them at 168/226. The UN ranks them 32/188.