Talk:Heat-assisted magnetic recording

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Computing (Rated Stub-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Stub-Class article Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
 
Note icon
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-Class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.

Correction[edit]

I understand that Fujitsu might have been WORKING with the technology in 2006 but I think the report that they developed it is not correct. Seagate had been working on demoing the technology back in 2002 as reported in this article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.65.241.130 (talk) 21:23, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

MiniDisc?[edit]

Shouldn't Sony MiniDisc be mentioned in this article? Jeh (talk) 22:16, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

Energy usage.[edit]

If this thing is using heat to increase data density, doesn't that mean that the drive uses a lot of energy to produce that heat? How do the numbers compare with a non-hamr drive? I imagine this would be a bigger deal in enterprise server racks, where heat is already a huge problem. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.157.226.255 (talk) 01:50, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

The lasers only need to heat a tiny area, so will use almost no power. [1] talks about a 150mW power usage laser, which is non-consequential compared to the ~5W total power usage of normal hard disks. Thue (talk) 04:01, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Why not just optical ?[edit]

Once a laser is added, why not scrap the magnetic part and use light-only process ?

Of course they know what they are doing, but we don't so reasons should be explained. After all, it is similar to Magneto-optical drive that fell into disuse.Musaran (talk) 07:45, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

Impact on head design & performance ?[edit]

Since writing is now determined by the heating focus, this should remove heavy constraints on head design and allow some other improvements.
OTOH, the added weight is bound to slow head movements.

This should be covered. Musaran (talk) 07:50, 21 July 2015 (UTC)