This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.
If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This page is about an active politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. Because of this, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.
I’m not sure I see why her trip to NZ in February 1998 is relevant to anything much. Seems to me the crucial points are:
She became an Australian citizen in January 1998. She did not relinquish her UK citizenship at that time, so she was a dual citizen.
She stood for election to the Qld state parliament in June 1998, but did not win. Her dual citizenship might have been an issue had she won, but she didn't, so it wasn't.
She stood for election to the Senate on 3 October 1998, and won a quota.
On 19 November she applied to relinquish her UK citizenship.
On 30 November her eligibility to be a candidate was challenged.
In June 1999 the Court of Disputed Returns decided she was not validly elected to the Senate because she was still a UK citizen at the time of her election, October 1998.
So, mention of her attempt to enter the Qld Parliament is appropriate, because it's part of her political career. But where she travelled to and what passport she used are irrelevant to the constitutional issues. At the time of her travel, she was a citizen of 2 countries and legally was permitted to use whichever passport she liked. Mention of this trip ought to be removed, imo, because it reads as if it was part of the reason why her election was declared invalid, but actually it had nothing to do with it, as far as I can see. The core issue for the Court to consider was whether she was entitled, by virtue of being a UK citizen, to hold a UK passport at the time of her election to the Senate. It wasn't whether or not she actually held such a passport, and it certainly wasn't whether or not she actually travelled on such a passport.
This needs tidying up, and breaking up into sections. Citation is needed throughout, but especially on the citizenship case. A picture shouldn't be hard to find. Edofedinburgh 20:57, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
Last edited at 20:00, 23 March 2013 (UTC). Substituted at 17:26, 29 April 2016 (UTC)