|This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to . If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.|
|WikiProject Biography||(Rated Start-class)|
|WikiProject Canada||(Rated Start-class, Low-importance)|
|WikiProject Business||(Rated Start-class, Mid-importance)|
these concluding remarks are pretty opaque: "Perhaps the most convenient example of his theory being implemented is on Kondak. Which proves that his Theory critically analyzes the theories effectiveness." they lack any reference, fail to explain what kondak is, making it hard to know that the kondak example "proves" anything. and then what it does ostensibly "prove" is utterly unclear. taking "theories" as an error for "theory's," i am at a loss to understand how "his theory" analyzes the effectiveness of "the theory." the claim that the kondak example "proves" that his theory "analyzes" anything is, at best, banal. chris — Preceding unsigned comment added by 126.96.36.199 (talk) 11:33, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
The comment(s) below were originally left at several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section., and are posted here for posterity. Following
|Despite the attentions of several editors, there are some serious problems with POV and editorialisng here - "writes prolifically" and "rather controversially", for example - the reader should be left to decide for themselves. Citations, footnotes and restructuring all needed here. Technical jargon also needs explaining. Edofedinburgh 04:02, 18 March 2007 (UTC) Also, his books should simply be italicised instead of having non-existent links created. A solid biography of the man should be created first. Edofedinburgh 04:04, 18 March 2007 (UTC)|
Last edited at 04:04, 18 March 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 17:44, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Henry Mintzberg. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070708082037/http://www.mintzberg.org/pdf/cv-hm.pdf to http://www.mintzberg.org/pdf/cv-hm.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
You may set the
|checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting
|needhelp= to your help request.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
If you are unable to use these tools, you may set
|needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.