Talk:Henry Ossian Flipper

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Article comments[edit]

I added some material and redid some parts. I also cleaned up the previous references. Article now seems more complete. This could easily become a GA article with a little more effort. Review requested. Jrcrin001 (talk) 17:54, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rank[edit]

His rank is listed as "General" but it appears he was dismissed from the Army at a relatively young age and not promoted posthumously? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.57.252.37 (talk) 03:30, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Obviously he wasn't a general. Nor was he in the Spanish-American War, so there seems to be no reason to include him in that category.2600:1004:B105:CE61:4C52:69D6:1E36:B8C9 (talk) 22:39, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Henry Ossian Flipper. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:06, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A suggested minor change in wording[edit]

It's a minor issue, but under the heading "10th Cavalry Regiment, the last sentence of the penultimate paragraph reads "Until November 1879, during his captain's four-month leave, Flipper commanded this unit by himself and received a well done." (emphasis added) The final words are confusingly written. "Well done" is usually a quote. The source it cites reads "Within months of receiving his new responsibilities, Flipper was receiving praise from his fellow officers for his handling of his commissary duties." So it appears that it was a general approval from his colleagues and superiors that Flipper received. Perhaps the sentence could be changed to "...Flipper commanded this unit by himself and earned the approval and praise of his fellow officers." Thoughts? Bricology (talk) 19:26, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]