Talk:Herman Dooyeweerd

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
edit·history·watch·refresh Stock post message.svg To-do list for Herman Dooyeweerd:


Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
  • Verify : Statements appear verifiable, but most are unsourced
  • Other : # It would be informative to trace the various streams of thought that go into, out of, and parallel to Dooyeweerd

Props[edit]

Wow, Mkmcconn, very nice work. Thank you very much! I need to read more of Dooyeweerd ... but not before having dinner first.... – Kaihsu 22:02, 2004 Feb 15 (UTC)

WikiProject class rating[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 04:06, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

"Studies"[edit]

Re: ==Studies== * Jonathan Chaplin, Herman Dooyeweerd: Christian Philosopher of State and Civil Society (Notre Dame, 2011).

  • Paul Otto, "In the twilight of Dooyeweerd's Corpus: The Publishing History of In the Twilight of Western Thought and the Future of Dooyewerd Studies." Philosophia Reformata 70, no. 1 (2005): 23-40.
This is not the best title for this section; if the article is at least in part based on these two works "Sources" would be better, and if not then "Further reading".--Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 20:09, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
I think it should be renamed "Further Reading" for now, since most of the citations come from pages on Basden's Dooyeweerd Pages. Only when the article is further developed with references to and quotes from other authors should we name the section "Sources and Further Reading" (or something along those lines). Mumford7 (talk) 19:21, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

"Von Alamassy"[edit]

He is mentioned only in the lead and nowhere else in the article. If he is relevant a little background information would be useful, also verifying whether this spelling, rather than "Almassy" or "Almasy", is correct.--Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 20:25, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

Bibliography[edit]

I thought I'd mention I am currently working on a Dooyeweerd bibliography, with links and all: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-ygY6TO4NJ2dBtgacF_jOdTzWpseFPlb8L3XuD4taRk/edit?usp=sharing. --Mumford7 (talk) 19:26, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

I have deleted the document listed above since my discovery of a 1977 bibliography prepared by L.D. Derksen, A.M. Petersen, and A.J. van Dijk. Mumford7 (talk) 23:28, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

Critiques[edit]

There have been quite a few critiques of Dooyeweerd's philosophy, many of them written in the late 20th century. Here's a link to my (working) bibliography of them: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Y1a-w-6WEzBMe5zJLC2xfR__jDiFXypwqVwyA9dY0zE/edit?usp=sharing. --Mumford7 (talk) 19:26, 16 March 2015 (UTC)