This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 04:06, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
Re: ==Studies== * Jonathan Chaplin, Herman Dooyeweerd: Christian Philosopher of State and Civil Society (Notre Dame, 2011).
Paul Otto, "In the twilight of Dooyeweerd's Corpus: The Publishing History of In the Twilight of Western Thought and the Future of Dooyewerd Studies." Philosophia Reformata 70, no. 1 (2005): 23-40.
This is not the best title for this section; if the article is at least in part based on these two works "Sources" would be better, and if not then "Further reading".--Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 20:09, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
I think it should be renamed "Further Reading" for now, since most of the citations come from pages on Basden's Dooyeweerd Pages. Only when the article is further developed with references to and quotes from other authors should we name the section "Sources and Further Reading" (or something along those lines). Mumford7 (talk) 19:21, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
He is mentioned only in the lead and nowhere else in the article. If he is relevant a little background information would be useful, also verifying whether this spelling, rather than "Almassy" or "Almasy", is correct.--Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 20:25, 31 May 2011 (UTC)