Talk:Hindu–Islamic relations

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

One sided presentation of religious violence -Nopt NPOV[edit]

This section only discusses the role that Hindus have had in executing violence against Muslims. This section does nothing to address the role Muslims have had in creating the environment and context for retaliation. The earlier passages clearly state that violence in hinduism is considered apt in self-defense or retaliation, but this passage only serves to scapegoat Hindus. Hindu-Muslim conflict is at least a thousand years old and in all fair perspective was started by the Muslims (Ghazni) after a history of semi-peaceful trade relations.

This entire article does nothing but serve an islamic propagandists purpose. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 21:20, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Factual errors? Islamic views on slavery, etc.[edit]

Having browsed this article while carrying out some background reading, it seems obvious that input is required to ensure factual NPOV. A definitive statement such as "The Quran and the Hadiths never permit the institution of slavery in Islam" stands out like a sore thumb vs. the article on Islamic views on slavery, for example. Harami2000 (talk) 01:09, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

I have reverted two IP edits on this very subject. They appeared, on the face of it, to be NPOV mass removal of sourced content. If there is general disagreement on this I will self-revert and discuss. TimothyJosephWood 13:15, 27 June 2016 (UTC)