Talk:History of Monash University

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
          This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject Australia / Melbourne / Education (Rated Start-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon History of Monash University is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Melbourne (marked as Low-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Education in Australia (marked as Low-importance).
 
Note icon
Need help improving this article? Ask a LibrarianWhat's this? at the National Library of Australia.
Note icon
The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to help@wikimedia.org.au for other than editorial assistance.
WikiProject Universities (Rated Start-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Universities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of universities and colleges on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 

Science and technology focus - neutrality[edit]

The article currently reads that Monash: 'was originally intended to have an emphasis on science and technology, to compensate for the perceived weakness in this area at University of Melbourne'

I have noticed that the neutrality of this has been questioned. This should be discussed. My own view is that this is a neutral comment. It has been referenced. It has much more to do with the broader context of universities and Australia at the time than with criticism of Melbourne University. The policy rationale behind establishing a second university in Melbourne was that, as new technology became more and more important in the economy, the State and Federal Governments formed the view that a specialist science and technology university should be built in Victoria. These areas had not been a focus of Melbourne University's research and it could not put through the number of students which the State required. Thus it is described in the article as a 'perceived weakness'. It is a 'perceived' weakness, not necessarily an actual weakness, but a perception of the governments and the Murray Committee nonetheless. To quote the reference in greater detail: 'The existing Australian universities, such as the University of Melbourne...defined themselves as one remove from government and 'a place apart' from the more plebian society around them. These universities now began to feel the pressures created by the emphasis on science and technology, and government-driven modernisation strategies. It was no longer possible to take all comers in every course.' It then describes the Federal Government's response and the Murray Committee's report.

If it is thought that the word 'weakness' carries too negative a connotation, then perhaps it could be changed to a less direct and meaningful, though perhaps more tolerable, phrase such as 'limited capacity' or 'limitations'.Profb21 (talk) 07:56, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for your comments. I have an issue because although it's referenced, it's citing a POV rather than an established fact. For example, would Melbourne uni agree with this statement? Michellecrisp (talk) 07:59, 12 June 2008 (UTC)