Talk:Homonym (biology)

Plants Mid‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tree of Life Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tree of Life, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of taxonomy and the phylogenetic tree of life on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tree of LifeWikipedia:WikiProject Tree of LifeTemplate:WikiProject Tree of Lifetaxonomic articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biology Mid‑importance

	Biology portal Homonym (biology) is part of the WikiProject Biology, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to biology on Wikipedia. Leave messages on the WikiProject talk page.BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject BiologyTemplate:WikiProject BiologyBiology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

The phrase "taxonomic homonym" is problematic, at least in botany. Homonym status is a nomenclatural matter. Taxonomy is about classification. "Nomenclatural homonym" would be okay, but "taxonomic homonym" is best avoided. Nadiatalent (talk) 18:59, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the problematic phrase. Nadiatalent (talk) 10:18, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

another hemihomonym at species level[edit]

Tritonia pallida: Nudibranch and Irid. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 197.89.123.119 (talk) 14:53, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done Loopy30 (talk) 15:48, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Is it correct to use Wikispeces as a source?[edit]

There are two instances of Wikispecies used as a source. Is it correct? -- Carnby (talk) 03:41, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]