Talk:Hook sword

China Low‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Technology / Weaponry Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force

It looks like these two topics are the same, but somebody who is more expert about Kung Fu weapons should do it. Thatcher131 18:15, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I suppose the question is whether or not there were hook swords outside of China during ancient times. If not it would seem the two are synonymous. -- Solberg 00:05, 3 May 2006 (UTC)Solberg[reply]

Hook swords and tiger hook swords are the same thing - the Combat section in the latter article is simply a repeat of what was originally in this article, and is filled with information that is either very questionable or outright wrong (ie. - Chinese "kata", only two forms, etc.). There is also the article Hooksword which is again filled with questionable information. I certainly support a merge. Ergative rlt 04:39, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I tagged Hooksword for merge also. If you have some degree of knowledge about the topic then go ahead and do the merge and leave redirects behind. You can wait a couple of days to see if anyone objects if that would make you more comfortable doing the merge. I would do it now but I don't know anything about the topic. (A picture would be nice, too, at some point) Thatcher131 14:41, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've added in the material from the other articles on alternate names and on fictional appearances, as well as adding some more original content; if no objections are raised I'll go ahead with the merger shortly. I'm also looking for a usable picture of antiques. Ergative rlt 22:20, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

~~still no picture, I will look for one.... Admiralsith 13:42, 1 July 2007 (UTC)~~[reply]

How would you sheath something like this?[edit]

Pics of scabbards? also, if you hook them together and swing them, how do you not lose the one you're not holding onto? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.73.70.113 (talk) 17:22, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unless my understanding is wrong, the momentum will keep them together until they swing back around for the user to grab them. 96.229.10.205 (talk) 19:34, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure you can use a scabbard for something like that. I searched on youtube for videos of hood swords, but unfortuenetly none of the demonstrators connected them together.Beefcake6412 (talk) 19:44, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Check out Spike's TV Show, Deadliest Warrior. They have an episode where a Shaolin Monk fights a Maori Warrior, and the Monk uses the Twin Hooks. It even shows them swinging them around while they are connected. AMWS (talk) 20:56, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

About the name "qian kun ri yue dao"[edit]

According to a Chinese version of wikipedia (http://baike.baidu.com/view/450881.html?wtp=tt), qian kun ri yue dao is actually a 2-meter long weapon with blades on both ends and crescent shaped guards like the hook sword. Anyone has a more reliable source to confirm/disprove this? Creature of ian (talk) 01:01, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

References[edit]

Having skimmed the Kennedy & Guo book, I see nothing in it about hook swords except for one illustration. What part of the article is referencing it? Difference engine (talk) 03:54, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hook sword. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080311135107/http://www.a3upodcast.com/node/151 to http://www.a3upodcast.com/node/151

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:08, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sharpness[edit]

Which parts of the sword are actually sharp. Is it just the crescent part of the hand guard and the end of the hilt? 213.149.61.56 (talk) 20:06, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]