Talk:Human resource management

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Business (Rated C-class, Top-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Top  This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

organisational structure[edit]

what is an organisation structure? — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 12:51, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Please consult the article on organizational structure. —Eustress talk 14:57, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

haw can i you for me unvarsty — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 16:26, 14 June 2013 (UTC)


I reverted edits by JorisvS to move this page and rename as "Human-resource management" (with a hyphen). The current nomenclature would appear to be the common name by most any standard. Is there any strong case otherwise? —Eustress talk 22:12, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

No there is no case anywhere in the HR world. NB the same user has also done this change to Human resource consulting and Human resource policies. I have requested moves back in all three so these two are still outstanding, assuming you are an Admin can you assist there too please? I think from recollection there is also one for an IT related discipline which has been currupted by this user in this way.Tmol42 (talk) 00:34, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

would it be appropriate to include efficacy studies?[edit]

I'm having a great deal of trouble finding empirically derived research on this topic. mostly all i can find is highly theoretical business jargon accompanied by no data gathering or poorly design qualitative data gathering. which leads many essays on the subject to suggest various systems without justification. would it be helpful to include a topic section that discussed the efficacy of HR? — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 05:07, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Subjective List of journals in article necessary?[edit]

This article has quite a long list of what appears to be some editor's favorite journals. Many more could be added too? I suggest they are taken out of the article entirely, or expanded significantly, for balance and not present a possibly biased, and definitely, a subjective list of journals as they currently stand? Thoughts from other editors first, and before I edit that section accordingly please?Mrm7171 (talk) 01:27, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

ASTD is now ATD[edit]

The American Society for Training and Development (ASTD) is now the Association for Talent Development (ATD), a non-profit association for workplace learning and performance professionals.

[1] (The titles of this referenced page and the disambiguation page should also be changed from ASTD to ATD.) (talk) 22:25, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

  1. ^