Talk:Hurricane Cosme (2007)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Good article Hurricane Cosme (2007) has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic star Hurricane Cosme (2007) is part of the 2007 Pacific hurricane season series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
Date Process Result
May 4, 2008 Good article nominee Listed
March 17, 2016 Good topic candidate Promoted
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on April 21, 2008.
Current status: Good article
WikiProject Tropical cyclones / Storms / Eastern Pacific  (Rated GA-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tropical cyclones, which collaborates on tropical cyclones and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details.
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the storm articles task force (marked as Low-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Pacific hurricane articles task force (marked as Low-importance).
Note icon
This article has been assessed by editors of the WikiProject.


WP:Good article usage is a survey of the language and style of Wikipedia editors in articles being reviewed for Good article nomination. It will help make the experience of writing Good Articles as non-threatening and satisfying as possible if all the participating editors would take a moment to answer a few questions for us, in this section please. The survey will end on April 30.

  • Would you like any additional feedback on the writing style in this article?

  • If you write a lot outside of Wikipedia, what kind of writing do you do?

  • Is your writing style influenced by any particular WikiProject or other group on Wikipedia?

At any point during this review, let us know if we recommend any edits, including markup, punctuation and language, that you feel don't fit with your writing style. Thanks for your time.

Yes, I always look for feedback and suggestions on the articles I write. I know my writing may not be the best, so any help is appreciated. I don't do that much writing outside of Wikipedia, and if I do it's mostly for school-related projects. And yes, I really think that my writing has improved because of having to keep up with the standards of the WikiProject Tropical cyclones. Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 13:49, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

Good Article Review[edit]

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:

Great work on this, it is very comprehensive and this article passes the rest of the criteria additionally. Hello32020 (talk) 14:05, 4 May 2008 (UTC)