Talk:Hypnotherapy in childbirth

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Medicine (Rated C-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Can anyone please add more detail if they are familiar with any of the methods listed on this site, including links and resources. I'm trying to give a much broader definition of hypnosis for childbirth than the term hypnobirthing. I'd like have more info on the different techniques and methods which use hypnosis during pregnancy and childbirth. Sophiefletcher 12:36, 1 June 2007 (UTC) sophie Fletcher

Any info on costs of licensing - who pays what to whom to become a registered hypnobirth instructor?--Vannin (talk) 17:18, 4 May 2009 (UTC)


Anyone have ideas what (talk · contribs) might be trying to accomplish with the edit-warring? The repeated removal of sourced information, sloppy editing, and claims that fail verification simply aren't acceptable. If there is some underlying problem that needs to be addressed, I cannot figure out what it might be from the edits to date and complete lack of comments. --Ronz (talk) 16:00, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

History - Priya and others[edit]

If we don't have sources independent of Priya's own works, then we shouldn't mention Priya. Likewise, we shouldn't include information just claiming without any sources that others have developed techniques based upon Dick-Read's. Further, the inclusion of this information to the first paragraph of the History section seems out of place, if not a WP:SOAP problem. --Ronz (talk) 18:44, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

Questionable Citation[edit]

Citation #3 seems useless. The Daily mail article has two anecdotes and zero studies. I'm going to remove it and add citation needed for the two clauses it supports or edit them to be less declarative. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paulgmiller (talkcontribs) 06:54, 2 December 2014 (UTC)