This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
The state of California 'paid' his employees in 1992 during a budget crisis with IOUs for several weeks. Arnold Schwarzenegger mentioned this as a potential option again in 2009. So the public use of IOUs would be an important topic for this article. --Emil Bild (talk) 09:33, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
I.O.U were issued by City of Chicago in 30s, probably there were other cases Larytet (talk) 15:47, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Move both as proposed by Cybercobra. Ucucha 17:47, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
IOU (debt) → IOU — The informal acknowledgement of debt is the primary topic. 3 of the other uses are named for it, and the remaining meanings of "IOU" are comparatively obscure. Cybercobra(talk) 07:27, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
I would normally support this since the other uses at IOU are derivative but IOU (debt) is not a particularly encyclopedically notable topic and therefore does not have automatic claim to primary topic-hood. — AjaxSmack 05:11, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
To be clear, I don't oppose the proposal. — AjaxSmack 03:54, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
I added a short "IOU (debt)" section to the article Warrant (of Payment) so that the IOU (debt) article can be REDIRECTed to the "Warrant (of Payment)" article. Greensburger (talk) 06:30, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
I'm not sure that would be the best merge target; while I can see overlooking the difference in specifying a specific repayment time, the rest of the definition of a warrant of payment doesn't fit quite as well (California media's use of the term notwithstanding): "a warrant is a written order from a first person that instructs a second person to pay a specified recipient [...]" --Cybercobra(talk) 06:50, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
True, it is an order to a treasurer to pay a specified recipient, but the face of the Warrant promises to pay: "The treasurer of California will pay out of Fund 1234" or "... out of available funds". That makes it a non-negotiable and unenforceable promise, just like an informal IOU. So Warrants and IOUs are similar. Greensburger (talk) 07:23, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
I agree, it's just that promissory note seems more similar, imo (if one wants to opt for a merge). It's also entirely possible we're overlooking some third, even better target (I'm not a finance person). :-) --Cybercobra(talk) 08:02, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
Promissory notes are negotiable and enforceable promises to pay, unlike warrants and IOUs. Greensburger (talk) 08:27, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
Promissory notes are not necessarily negotiable and unlike warrants are directly between the payer and payee. IOUs are of course neither promissory notes nor warrants; they're not promissory notes in that they're unenforceable and they're not warrants in that there's only 2 parties involved; and unlike both, IOUs don't typically specify a repayment date. I personally just find the unenforceability a less drastic difference than the number of parties. --Cybercobra(talk) 09:06, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:IOU (disambiguation) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 20:00, 25 April 2014 (UTC)