Talk:IPhone recycling

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Apple Inc. / iOS  (Rated C-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Apple Inc., a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Apple, Macintosh, iOS and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
C-Class article C  This redirect does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.
Checklist icon
 Low  This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This redirect is supported by iOS task force (marked as Low-importance).


I would suggest this page was created for Search Engine Optimisation - the companies listed in the article want this page to appear when someone Googles 'recycling iphone'...


This should be merged into an article about mobile recycling or e-waste recycling.


I'm concerned about the notability of this article topic mainly because of the lack of reliable sources. I'm aware that this article is still under construction, and maybe my input could help?

There are three major issues regarding the sources being used here:

  • The sources used are from organizations or individuals with an agenda
  • The sources don't specifically mention the iPhone
  • The sources pre-date the launch and announcement of the iPhone

Sources with conflicting political, environmental, or business agendas include:

Only a few sources were actually written in the same time frame and actually mention the iPhone:

Also, there is the minor issue of many external links from sources already being outdated. I'm a bit confused by this, as the article was written just recently.

On a side note, there's a bit of a focus issue regarding the content. For example, the Regulation section does not mention any regulation that was implemented in reaction to the iPhone. Basically, I'm just not seeing how this warrants an article of its own. What I do see is enough notability to warrant a recycling movement article, but there's already one of those.

Thanks for giving my input a read, --Brianreading (talk) 03:50, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Sure, that's worth working on. The difficult links are probably to the pay sites, they often show up differently for other users than for the one posting them, but that can be addressed without much difficulty. Some of the links were copied from computer recycling, and I haven't gotten all the POV angles out of that one yet. And I probably didn't get enough sleep before posting the whole megillah of what I had here. :D Will return, thanks for the suggestions! JJB 04:03, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
Thanks, let me know if you need anymore input. Brianreading (talk) 07:08, 24 March 2009 (UTC)