Talk:IRC flood

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
WikiProject IRC (Rated C-class, High-importance)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject IRC, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Internet Relay Chat on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 High  This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Bad first sentence fragment[edit]

Flooding on an IRC network is a method of disconnecting users from the IRC server

Flooding is not necessarily intended to kick someone off a server (a denial-of-service attack). It can be used to annoy people or get attention by saying things repeatedly. This sense is also called spamming. -- Myria 06:46, 4 November 2005 (UTC)

That's true. But the sentence explains what flooding _basically_ is. Its purpose is to disconnect users from the server or to annoy the conversation of others. But in this case, feel free to edit the article. --Niggurath 14:45, 5 November 2005 (UTC)

I also agree that "flooding" does not usually refer to disconnecting someone, and this is not the usual intent. Most IRC servers, as well as most IRC clients, have built-in protection against these sorts of things, and so it is very rare for anyone to ever be disconnected due to this these days. It is primarily intended to disrupt the flow of conversation. AaronWL 19:08, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

The person flooding may be disconnected with an 'excess flood' message, but generally, neither the server nor the clients being flooded will have major troubles, it's really just an annoyance. Michael Billington (talkcontribs) 08:44, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

ICMP flood[edit]

Typically referred to as a ping flood. This attack sends so much information to the client it causes lag or disconnection; Often caused by either IRC clients working in union or botnets of Eggdrop bots. This is also a simple DDoS attack.

Since it's a DDoS attack, and takes place entirely off the IRC protocol, should this really be here? The only link it has to IRC is that targets are found through IRC, and since most IRCds have some way to hide the user's origin, it's not really an IRC flood. --Sarten-X 20:08, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

Is this vandalism?[edit]

I notice this sentence in the article: Mogar has done this many many times on the icq server.

Is this vandalism?

--Agus elex 2005 20:15, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

Other floods[edit]

Flooding is not limited to IRC. Crapflood (generally large numbers of messages, not one long message) also occurs in NNTP newsgroups. This is intended to make a newsgroup unusable by increasing the noise content. Since ICMP flood is actually not an IRC flood, perhaps the title of the article should be changed to "Internet Floods".

DERoss (talk) 04:48, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

Requested move 21 June 2017[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved. No opposition, and seems reasonable. For future reference, when proposing multiple related RMs, it's better to do it as a multi-move, per WP:RM#Requesting multiple page moves.  — Amakuru (talk) 11:22, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Internet Relay Chat floodIRC flood – Unnecessary expansion of "IRC". See ex. TCP congestion control, IRC Bot. (talk) 10:54, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Necessary article?[edit]

IMO this article could be merged into Internet Relay Chat. (talk) 10:54, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on IRC flood. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

As of February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete the "External links modified" sections if they want, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{sourcecheck}} (last update: 15 July 2018).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:52, 26 December 2017 (UTC)