Talk:Independent telephone company

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Independent telephone company. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:45, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

tense[edit]

The google voice article indicates that you can't make calls to some (expensive) independent telephone company subscribers. That suggests that they still exist, and that this article should be present tense. Should it be changed? Gah4 (talk) 22:52, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Certainly these do still exist, for instance Cape Vincent, New York +1-315-654... or Westport, Ontario +1-613-273... are small-town independents. I question the wording of the intro, though: "An independent telephone company was a telephone company providing local service in the United States or Canada that was not part of the Bell System..." The incumbent local exchange carrier in some provinces (like British Columbia and Alberta) is not and never was Bell. Telus is incumbent in most of BC and Alberta. They're not an independent, they're a dominant carrier. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.237.51.121 (talk) 01:18, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]