GA Review [ edit ]
Article ( edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: ( SMasters talk) 14:12, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
(see GA review here for criteria)
reasonably well written.
(prose): b (: MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists)
There were a few punctuation errors, which I have fixed.
factually accurate and .
(references): b (citations to : reliable sources) c (: OR)
Article is properly referenced and has no
WP:OR. It is
broad in its coverage.
(major aspects): b (focused):
Article covers all major aspects and is focused.
It follows the
neutral point of view policy
Fair representation without bias:
Article complies to
WP:NPOV. It is
No edit wars, etc.:
Article is stable.
It is illustrated by
, where possible and appropriate.
(images are tagged and non-free images have : fair use rationales) b (appropriate use with : suitable captions)
Images are properly tagged and captioned.
Overall: It is not often that I pass an article after one read, but this article is one of those times. There were a few minor punctuation errors and I have fixed them. Otherwise, this article complies to all the requirements for a GA, and I am happy to pass it. Well done! – ( SMasters talk) 14:45, 22 March 2011 (UTC)