Talk:Indian order of precedence

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject India / Politics (Rated List-class, High-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.
 List  This article has been rated as List-Class on the project's quality scale.
 High  This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Indian politics workgroup (marked as Top-importance).
 
Note icon
This article was last assessed in September 2008.


List or table?[edit]

Currently, the order of precedence is presented in the form of a table, with the numbers added in manually. Wouldn't it make more sense to do this as an ordered list, where the numbering is done automatically?

For example, the first two lines would look like this:

  1. President
  2. Vice President

instead of this:

Rank Member
1 President
2 Vice President
3 ...

Any thoughts? Alkari 22:41, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Yes, a table is better. I'll clean it up. =Nichalp «Talk»= 05:41, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

Incorrect example[edit]

This order / warrant of precedence is incorrect. Many persons are placed on certain numbers. For example, there may be ten categories of ranks / posts / authorities in a single article. Lawexpert 16:22, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

For example? =Nichalp «Talk»= 05:41, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

Reference[edit]

http://rajyasabha.nic.in/guidelinesmlamp/chap11.htm

What Happened to the article[edit]

This article is coming up as empty, with only the heading repeated. Why? 106.216.128.234 (talk) 14:44, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Indian order of precedence. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:49, 10 April 2017 (UTC)