Talk:Individual reclamation

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Philosophy (Rated Start-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.


Moved from User talk:N1h1l

Yo, nice work on the article; I'm just wondering where you got the title from? I had never come across it in English before, and none of the first (10 of 733) Google hits except the Wikipedia article seem to use the term in this sense. I'm wondering if we should move the article to reprise individuelle? скоморохъ 02:50, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

I've seen multiple terms used as English equivalent to "la reprise individuelle," including "individual reclamation" and "individual appropriation." I'm open to whatever others feel we should use. My bias is towards things that I can pronounce easily. - N1h1l (talk) 20:06, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
wondering how this is different from "expropriation"? Chaikney (talk) 20:04, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Theorization of tactics...[edit]

Please see my comments on expropriative anarchism. Besides, it is intrinsically absurd to speak of "theft" by the poor of the rich, at least according to any left-leaning definition of property in history (we do not speak of the theft of water by the thirsty from the quenched in our articles about water distribution). Articles like this, then, are strange hybrids. Tothebarricades (talk) 13:06, 18 November 2013 (UTC)